User talk:Lakestein

Welcome!

Hello, Lakestein, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SGFC Athletics Sport Club moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SGFC Athletics Sport Club, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. VickKiang (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be trivially mentioned at 1, this reference about the SGFC Athletics Sports Club at The Guardian Nigeria seems to be decent. Nevertheless, as it currently stands this is obviously not ready for mainspace, completely unsourced and with no content whatsoever excepting for a basic infobox. VickKiang (talk) 02:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you VickKiang

SGFC Athletics page is a new article as in work in progress. I want to appreciate you for few pointers and for making review proper. I will follow instructions as provided by the Wikipedia and ensure all write up and article for the same has a reliable and verifiable source. Lakestein (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vickang. It is a pleasure. can you help look at the article in Article for creation in draft.

please check my article to ascertain if its suitable for final publication into the main space. its about 5 months now Lakestein (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:SGFC Athletics Sport Club has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:SGFC Athletics Sport Club. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will add the cite and source to the article. Lakestein (talk) 02:27, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you are noy helping Greenman. i dont want a handout, all i seek for is proper diligence. all article comment and paragraphs contained sourced articles. if you feel is not sourced please remove it. this association or organization need to be in Wikipedia main space Lakestein (talk) 01:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SGFC Eagles Maryland, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:28, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you and this is noted. Lakestein (talk) 00:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SGFC Athletics Sport Club (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A neutral encyclopedic article cannot refer to "our stakeholders" etc. See also WP:COI - COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SGFC Athletics Sport Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lakestein! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 06:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greenman, (re: draft:SGFC Athletics Sports Club)

i really appreciate the observation you made in my draft article. I value your time. after careful considerations of what you have listed as corrections, i have done my due diligence and have sourced, cite reliable and verifiable sources to validate my article. I would like you to please review the draft article again that was resubmitted. Lakestein (talk) 02:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi Greenman.

this is Lakestein, i would like you to assist in the review of my article to ascertain if its suitable for final publication into the main space. Its almost 5 months now. Lakestein (talk) 18:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were asked to rewrite it. You didn't properly ping the editor, so they had no way of knowing that you asked them something. In the meantime, I removed your test edit at Main space. Drmies (talk) 00:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can you help me ping the editor properly. its almost 3 months. the correction of sources was what i was asked to address and i have properly made it. Lakestein (talk) 00:37, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've been here for six years; that's something you could have learned. You also could try to clean up these references and provide full bibliographical information: I wouldn't want to review the draft since the bibliography is such a mess. Greenman, your input is request--thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lakestein: (this, and the method used by Drmies, are examples of how to notify a user - it's not strictly necessary in your case, as you're always notified of comments on your own talk page). The draft has not been submitted for review - if you submit the draft for review, a reviewer will take a look at the current state and make a decision. Note that it probably won't be me, as there are many reviewers, but also a backlog of thousands of articles needing review. Also note that you removed the previous decline and comments. I'll restore them, as there's a note that says "Do not remove this line!", so please don't remove again. Future reviewers make use of this in their evaluations. Greenman (talk) 10:48, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SGFC Athletics Sport Club (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SGFC Athletics Sport Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At this point i feel like there is something missing here. If you all in this clique feels i have a wrong article why not edit it and give a final write up. this is a bullshit and will not take this submission. every of my write up is verifiable and can be sourced from the articles quoted. its almost 1 year and all i will get is that the article is not verifiable. this is unrealistic. i have reviewed and edited several paragraphs as proposed but still all i get is denial. ITs all bull crap Lakestein (talk) 00:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

cerebellum mentioned the article looked like an advertisement. This is absurd. do we have a clique here? what are the contents required of an organization with credible sourced information.

Please lets check well on the article and delete irrelevant sections rather than writing that is an advertisement, This is not right rather than suspending an article for incompetence Lakestein (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello people,

I hereby submit this article for creation today December 29th 2023. Following your response and guide carefully. I have re-write SGFC Athletics article, and have made relevant corrections as you mentioned. every statement that seemed,looked or termed to be like an advertisements has been deleted. All sections with unsourced references have been modified to available reliable references. i am submitting the article today for review. i trust this time it will an acceptable.

Thank you and i await further clarifications.

Lakestein Lakestein (talk) 00:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SGFC Athletics Sport Club (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your use of WP:BAREURLS obscures the real source of information from your references. Twitter is not an acceptable source. Review WP:REFB for more information about inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SGFC Athletics Sport Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 02:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SGFC logo 2023.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SGFC logo 2023.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SGFC Athletics Sport Club has been accepted

SGFC Athletics Sport Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 11:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]