User talk:Lake4455

November 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of wars involving the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of wars involving the United States was changed by Lake4455 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897219 on 2014-11-09T08:04:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of wars involving the United States shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sjö (talk) 09:36, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lake4455 reported by User:Sjö (Result: ). Thank you. Sjö (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, please discuss on Talk:List of wars involving the United States. Sjö (talk) 10:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that we are all here to build a better encyclopedia. Please assume good faith and start a discussion on the talk page, where you can explain your arguments better than in edit comments. Sjö (talk) 11:03, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Sjö. You might want to report the IP user again because he's back with a new IP. Lake4455 (talk) 11:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked by Philg88 as a sockpuppet. The article is now protected so it can only be edited by autoconfirmed users until November 16. Sjö (talk) 13:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of wars involving the United States with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I just explained in the last edit. You're welcome. Lake4455 (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at [[:List of wars involving the United States]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Philg88 ^♦talk 11:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Philg88. I don't know how to contact you directly since I'm blocked but the IP user that you blocked has gotten himself a new IP to avoid block and is continuing to revert. Lake4455 (talk) 11:43, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "ping" is enough to alert me. I have blocked the second IP address for 24 hours. Philg88 ^♦talk 11:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Discussion

There is a talk page discussion going on here on the Vietnam war outcome that you might be interested in. - SantiLak (talk) 23:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Kirothereaper (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at List of wars involving Australia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]