User talk:LairdCamelot

Welcome!

Hello, LairdCamelot, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 06:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Wes sideman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Conversion therapy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wes sideman (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lee Harvey Oswald, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Acroterion (talk) 11:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop casting aspersions against editors with editors who have the temerity to challenge your edits or to disagree with you. In the context of the subject, it's frankly ludicrous to insinuate a conflict of interest - is there an organization dedicated to persecuting the memory of LHO that we're not aware of? You've also been warned for edit-warring, bludgeoning discussions, and unfounded aspersions of bullying, as well as nibbling at the edges of WP:NLT. Acroterion (talk) 11:52, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion Cyber bullying, by the unspeakables, is a mockery of Jimmy Wales' legacy and your soul can only be corrupted by wickedly trashing this site with PR.

Cyber-bullying is all that is left of this site.

Consider your achievement. LairdCamelot (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fringe vandalism at Talk:MMR vaccine and autism

This is a bannable fringe comment.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:MMR vaccine and autism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Laird in "That Hideous Strength"

This person is not mentioned "numerous times" (less than 10 times), and is strictly "offscreen", so all we know about him is hearsay, and does not play any kind of vital role in the book... AnonMoos (talk) 05:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at That Hideous Strength

Your recent editing history at That Hideous Strength shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 13:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]