User talk:Lainagier/2006
I had to partially revert your edits, as Chrissy Bray was never a Big Brother contestant at any stage at all. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 07:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Para reedited with your correction. Looks like I picked the wrong weekend to quit sniffing glue. Many thanks Arnz.Lainagier 00:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
FYI
[edit]Stub template goes above categories.[1] Ty 09:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks. That's something that's changed since I last read up on it - which was a long time ago. You might be interested in this historic discussion,[2] and a recent one.[3] Ty 11:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
The goal posts of course keep on changing! Ty 11:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Featured sound candidate
[edit]Hi, I wonder whether you have time to look in at Wikipedia:Featured_sound_candidates/When_Johnny_Comes_Marching_Home. It's a matter of balancing what I see as a poor musical performance with any historical value the recording has (yet to be justified by the nominators). The criteria are here. TONY (talk) 03:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the rather harsh introduction above - don't take it personally :-P ! Just to say that I agree with a previous editor on the Bell End article - the word vulgar is neither relevant (it's a slang term regardless of anything else) nor particularly neutral. Like the other editor said, it is entirely subjective as to the interpretation of the article. If anything, it should be mentioned in the glans penis article that it is vulgar, but this will be subject to the above issues. Due to this I will be reverting back to the neutral edit. Of course, you are welcome to oppose this and I welcome you to discuss this further. However, I'd recommend you discuss before changing, as I can see this heading down the WP:3RR route. Booglamay (talk) - 13:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- You wouldn't be the first to start a conversation that way. :-D I'm completely happy with the revert - there's better ways to be remembered than "the Bell End edit war guy". For the record, I intended "vulgar" in its lexicographic meaning, denoting a kind of slang that's "common" rather than merely informal. Splitting hairs, certainly, and after two edits it's clear I underestimated the ambiguity and overlooked the emotional tone it carries. I might be a crashing pedant but I certainly won't defend ambiguity on WP. Especially when it's reverted so politely. :-) • Lainagier • talk • 01:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)