User talk:Lagrange613/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lagrange613. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
DYK for Arthur R. Gralla
On 11 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arthur R. Gralla, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arthur R. Gralla was the US Navy's fourth Jewish Vice Admiral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur R. Gralla. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arthur R. Gralla), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Louis Dreller
On 20 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Louis Dreller, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Louis Dreller was decorated by both the United States and Brazil for designing and building World War II warships? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Louis Dreller. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Louis Dreller), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Theorem infobox
First, I did give an argument. In the talk page. So kindly don't pretend I didn't in the edit summary: it's insulting, and it shows that you did not actually bother to check or to listen before trying to lecture. Second, nobody is saying that consensus is needed before any change. Rather, that if a change is seriously contested, as this one clearly is, then it makes sense for the status quo ante to hold while the discussion is taking place. So again, don't misrepresent the argument being made. Magidin (talk) 19:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- The relevant discussion is happening at Talk:Fermat's Last Theorem. I copied this comment over and replied there. Lagrange613 15:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
"Prior" consensus to infobox on FLT
From a bureaucratic POV, void of any context, one is correct in claiming the right of adding that box, but I want to inform you about a previous held discussion at the TP of Project Math, inclined to "not using this box". Even setting aside this fact, I am convinced of my right to revert the addition, and to require a discussion for reaching a consensus on the article's TP. Upsetting the BRD-process for my not explicit referral to a discussion elsewhere seems wrong under any circumstances. Re-adding the box prior to a consensus looks like the possible start of an edit war. Purgy (talk) 09:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- This user posted an almost identical message to the talk page where the discussion is happening. I've replied there. Lagrange613 15:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'll just add here that I've edited the article in question once since 2014, so the implication that I'm edit warring is baseless. Lagrange613 15:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for having the courage to change your mind at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Munjal. Edwardx (talk) 09:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Oh geez, are we giving out barnstars now for being persuadable? I guess things really have gone to pot....
Thanks. Lagrange613 13:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Precious
Princeton University
Thank you for quality articles such as Princeton University Chapel, Charles Henry Smyth Jr., Henry DeWolf Smyth and Janice Eberly, for copy-editing, for an essay saying "if you embrace those premises, you know it's worth it anyway", - mathematician, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
A year ago, you were recipient no. 2200 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, Gerda! Lagrange613 15:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lexicon Branding logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lexicon Branding logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Precious anniversary
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Gerda! Hope all's well... Lagrange613 01:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Eliza Kennedy Smith
On 4 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eliza Kennedy Smith, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Eliza Kennedy Smith's investigations of municipal corruption in Pittsburgh led to the mayor's arrest and imprisonment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eliza Kennedy Smith. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eliza Kennedy Smith), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 12:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
|
The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal | |
| Congratulations! You have reached the milestone of creating or expanding 25 articles that have been featured in the "Did you know ..." section of the Main Page. Thanks for writing articles and hooks about interesting members of the Treasury Department, geologists and other academics, historical people, and more. Keep 'em coming! DanCherek (talk) 18:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC) |
 |
Congratulations! - Thank you for support in the RfC! Listening to the charity concert mentioned here. I created the articles of the composer and the soprano. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
The Prayer is on the Main page, finally + new flowers, and btw: the TFA is a young writer's first --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda! Wikipedia is a better place for all the cheer you spread. Lagrange613 01:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)