User talk:Lagouttenoire

Welcome

Hello, Lagouttenoire, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Lagouttenoire's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emile Wennekes (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references at all - requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emile Wennekes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emile Wennekes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lagouttenoire! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry you've been contacted by a predatory "editor"

Fraudulent paid editors are one of the curses of Wikipedia (in all languages). Sadly, there is nothing we can do, since this is by definition the encyclopedia that anybody can edit. We do, however, require that anybody who is being paid to edit Wikipedia explicitly announce that fact, so that the public may be warned of the probability that their edits will favor their clients' interests. Persons purporting to "fix" your Wikipedia problems for pay not only have no official standing in Wikipedia, they are in fact widely despised and watched sedulously for behaviors which violate our Terms of Service. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emile Wennekes (July 23)

[[

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Viztor was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check [[1]] and Wikipedia:Citation_templates on how to cite sources. You may also use the visual editor to aid. Currently it is quite mixed up.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emile Wennekes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emile Wennekes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

viztor ✦ 18:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...providing reliable sources for the page on Prof. dr. Emile Wennekes

Lagouttenoire (talk) 13:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am Bobherry. I suggest checking WP:RD There are plenty of editors that will be happy to help you there. If you have any more questions feel free to message me on User talk: Bobherry! Have a nice day! Bobherry Talk Edits 15:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lagouttenoire:, your request is a bit brief; do you want help finding the sources or help deciding what counts as a reliable source? From the template above, I'm going to make the assumption that it is the second possibility. The standards for what are accepted as reliable sources are at this link. The message above and the notice at Draft:Emile Wennekes also link to two other links you should click and read: the link for Referencing for beginners and the link for how to cite sources. Together, those three links will probably answer most questions you have.

Looking at the draft article specifically, some of the sources would not be considered reliable because they are social media links (the LinkedIn page) or self-published sources (his C.V. and Berghapedia) or a trivial mention (the KVNM page). References in these categories violate the verifiability policy. Most of the rest of the references you provided were either links to publisher's pages for his books or links to projects he's involved in. The kind of references we would be looking for are sources that are: (1) significantly about Prof. Wennekes (2) published in sources independent of the professor and (3) published in reliable sources. Examples would be scholarly reviews of his many books or popular media coverage of his research or newspaper articles about them or profiles by a respected academic organization they are involved with. I suggest looking at some of the articles about other musicologists to get a feel of what are considered good sources.

You might also want to try creating an article about the professor on the Dutch Wikipedia first. For users whose primary language is not English, starting by creating a new page on the English Wikipedia is often frustrating. There is a perception that the English project is the primary one or the central one. This is not the case. The other language ones are stand-alone projects and just as important as the English one and come up in Google results as easily. I hope that helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emile Wennekes has been accepted

Emile Wennekes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 21:12, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]