User talk:LadyGaGaChristmas

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of LadyGaGaDDDisco (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

December 2012

Please read WP:NSONGS before recreating the article about some "lost" Gaga song. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 00:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same for the associated album. 76.102.49.177 (talk) 01:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LadyGaGaChristmas, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi LadyGaGaChristmas! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Mark Arsten (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LadyGaGaDDDisco for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Real Love/Christmas Tree

The article Real Love/Christmas Tree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 08:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Real Love (Lady GaGa song)

The article Real Love (Lady GaGa song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Notability guidelines. Needs a fundamental rewrite.

Probable a case of WP:G11. May be merged into another page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 08:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]