User talk:LadyC.A.

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mao Asada, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mao Asada was changed by LadyC.A. (u) (t) deleting 20173 characters on 2008-12-13T20:32:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Shenzhao5.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shenzhao5.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shenzhao6.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Shenzhao6.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 09:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shenzhao5.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Shenzhao5.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 10:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shenzhao5.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Shenzhao5.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "detailed results"

Hello. We seem to be in a long, protracted edit war over the best use of "detailed results" tables. I understand why you like to keep them all as one table. However, here are my reasons for preferring them seperated by season:

1) It makes them easier to edit for new editors, who may not be aware of exactly how tables work.

2) It cuts down on the need for "legacy" columns. A legacy column would be the kind in the Mirai Nagasu or Caroline Zhang articles, where the skater has once or twice competed at a competition that had a qualifying round. Under your use of one large table, the qualifying round column becomes a legacy column: it needs to keep being added and being left blank. It is cumbersome, and it makes it more difficult for new editors to keep up these tables.

3) Large tables are cumbersome to edit. There are various kinds of divisions, however, "by season" is the only truly truthful division. Seperating "by level" can be dishonest and incorrect because many skaters compete at more than one level in a season.

These are my reasons. I would like discuss this with you further here so we can come to an agreement on what would work best for the articles. Kolindigo (talk) 23:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Did you see this? I'd still like to discuss this with you. Kolindigo (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extra breaks

Why do you keep adding extra unnecessary break tags to tables? Kolindigo (talk) 01:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello. I don't know you. Good Day. Adult Swim Addict (talk) 08:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Rippon

Please stop changing the results tables for the above article. Your edits have been disputed at the article's talk page by two editors and you must obtain consensus for your edits first before re-inserting them. You already had several warnings and if you continue re-inserting your edits without consensus and while refusing to discuss the matter at the article's talk page, your account will be blocked from editing. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 21:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war at Kim Yu-Na

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kim Yu-Na. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Ka renjc 19:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Korean show info

Wikipedia is NOT for Korean gala Advertising page,please do it your blog or something.Thank you. --Etzt (talk) 14:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me that this is properly sourced information. It is reported in what appears to be a reliable newspaper, which supports the information in the article. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, Harry. for example,Stéphane Lambiel page. Lambiel will appear many shows in this summer not only 'All that ....'.

Althogh, he has appeared other Korean show in this month,too.http://www.stephanelambiel.ch/?lang=en&p=news BUT THIS USER JUST IGNORES IT! May be,that Korean show isn't 'Kim yuna company's show'. This user always JUST WANTS do such promotions at top class skater's bio.--Etzt (talk) 03:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look Talk:Stéphane Lambiel, too. Thank you--Etzt (talk) 06:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kim Yu-Na. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rylie McCulloch-Casarsa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rylie McCulloch-Casarsa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rylie McCulloch-Casarsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hergilei (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kate Charbonneau

The article Kate Charbonneau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kate Charbonneau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Charbonneau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Charbonneau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rachel Kirkland

The article Rachel Kirkland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]