User talk:Lado85/Archive 2018

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of School of Rock episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at School of Rock (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of School of Rock episodes. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 07:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop!

Stop editing Rugby articles. You are making it very wrong... I will contact to administration about permanent ban on your IP

Rugby

Please stop edit warring. You are adding incorrect, irrelevant and unsourced info to these pages. There is a discussion here if you want to take part - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_union#"End_of_year_internationals"_/_"Summer_internationals"_articles --hippo43 (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yoг are doing inсorrect edits. Stop owning a page. I wrote souse page, but you haven't see it yet - http://officiating.worldrugby.org/?page=appointments&id=65 , http://officiating.worldrugby.org/?page=appointments&id=65/. Or world rugby isn't source for you?Lado85 (talk) 05:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I explained at the discussion linked to above why you are incorrect. Please stop edit warring and inserting unsourced games, or engage in the discussion there. Thanks --hippo43 (talk) 07:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You explained? Your edits are unsourced an incorrect. Stop OWNING the page. Lado85 (talk) 07:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lado85. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

When your edits a reverted in good faith, with an explanation, please do not simply restore them. Per WP:BRD you should open a discussion on the article's talk page and, while discussion is underway, the status quo should remain, per WP:STATUSQUO. Your changes should not be reinstated until you have established a consensus with other editors. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not inappropriately bold content as you did at MythBusters (2013 season).[1][2] Per MOS:BOLD, bolding should only be used in certain circumstances. Notes may be italicised but not bolded. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:01, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes are bolded in all seasons, and always was. Why the may not be bolde in season 2013? Whi it wasn't problem for you till today?Lado85 (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The notes shouldn't have been bolded. The bolding issue was actually my fault. A long time ago it was common to bold these things but the Manual of Style is constantly evolving and it's no longer appropriate to bold. In case you weren't aware, there are well over 5 million pages on Wikipedia and some things don't get noticed, occasionally for years. Wikipedia is not working to a deadline and we generally only fix things when they are noticed. This was the case today, when I saw your edits to the page which is on my watchlist. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]