User talk:LaddieJohn
This is LaddieJohn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hellenic Malt Whisky Society (HMWS) (January 28)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hellenic Malt Whisky Society (HMWS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hellenic Malt Whisky Society (HMWS), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, LaddieJohn!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 13:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hellenic Malt Whisky Society (HMWS) (January 29)
[edit]Hellenic Malt Whisky Society (HMWS) Reply
[edit]Just because an organization or society exists it does not mean that it is automatically notable and therefore able to have its own Wikipedia page. There are certain criteria that an article is required to satisfy before it is considered acceptable. The basic principle for all articles is that it should have significant coverage in multiple independent verifiable secondary sources. In respect to your draft the only references provided are primary sources (i.e. sources produced by the organisation itself) because they are not independent they are not acceptable or reliable. Similarly social media websites and blogs are not acceptable as they are user generated without any independent editorial oversight (i.e. just because someone posts it doesn't necessarily make it true or accurate). It may be that there just aren’t the secondary sources in respect to the HMWS which would mean that the society is just not notable. Dan arndt (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)