User talk:Ladam26/Rough Draft:Tectonic Evolution of the Transantarctic Mountains

I like the page. The information is presented in a logical format and is easy to follow. One of the only things I would suggest is maybe incorporating a figure or two to help explain some geological concepts that people with no significant knowledge of the topic can use. For example, some people may not know what "seismic reflection" is. A simple picture/figure may help with that. Ericorphys73 (talk) 06:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Eric Orphys

Evan Roundtree's Review

Great page! A couple things I would recommend adding are things like unit conversions from (km to miles) I believe that "6 kilometres (4 mi)" is the correct format in the edit text view, minus "_". This way others can understand km and miles, if they are only used to one or the other. There are a few grammatical errors that if you don't fix I think Webb said someone would. As Eric said, you should throw in at least one more picture to help explain and elaborate on your topic a little better.
Commented on by __ Eround1

This article is good. The page is well formatted and organized to cover the material. The figure is simple and easy to understand but could probably be moved lower to be near the part of the page that it relates to. It could also use other figure to better explain concepts as well as a few more links to pages about the terms used in it's explanation. More should be said about the cretaceous part of the article bacause that is the time in which two out of the three events listed earlier occurred. - David Pipkin — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidMP1 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)