User talk:Lacipetom

October 2022

Hello, I'm Tommi1986. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doha have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 12:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Doha, you may be blocked from editing. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 12:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I do not understand what you mean. I just updated the image, no ads. Please be attention. blocked from editing for what?! Lacipetom (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the description for the picture you have written "We are proud to announce as official partner in the one of the most prestigious works in Middle East." This is promotional and not allowed on Wikipedia. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 12:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you It is true, this my mistake, you are right. Lacipetom (talk) 12:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahvaz. Also please avoid using peacock wording. Riverbend21 (talk) 10:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Babak Zanjani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zanjan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your revision. If you can update the article with a reliable source that indicates his birthplace as Zanjan rather than Tehran, then the change would be fine. Suriname0 (talk) 17:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for respected you to my edits. ok Lacipetom (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Labaniat Haraz Amol VC

The article Labaniat Haraz Amol VC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSPORTS / WP:NORG - the official website links to a dairy company, the references are either primary sources or a phot gallery of volleyball games. Neither of which are reliable independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 04:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for warning. I go to try improve the article Lacipetom (talk) 05:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

for what

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lacipetom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no reason to block me. By distorting history and endlessly bullying and insulting me, some scammers were doing massive sabotage, and I stood up to them. The reward for preventing sabotage is blocking?!! Where is this in Wikipedia law? Lacipetom (talk) 22:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock. Talk page access revoked.Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Read the block notice. You are blocked as a WP:SOCK of an already blocked user. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 22:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also note this globally blocked user. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]