User talk:Labor reporter

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Labor reporter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocking not warranted

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sockpuppet. I have also blocked User:Labor Watch and two other accounts I identified as yours. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have no relation to other accounts. This look is being used against me on other wiki projects. Labor reporter (talk) 02:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's painfully obvious that you are User:Labor Watch. I highly doubt that two "unrelated" people would choose a very similar username, and your contributions and behavior passes the duck test pretty darn easily. Also, making another unblock request with the same reason and no explanation will not help your case. Thekillerpenguin (talk) 03:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked three other users because of me? Oh, I am so sorry I asked. Labor reporter (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This block was arbitrary. The related name was because of shared interests. Nothing more. I'm editing from a public space and a public terminal. I'm not as much interested in editing here on Wikipedia as I am clearing my name the other unfortunates who were blocked a log with me. Labor reporter (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]