User talk:La Bicyclette

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Guarana. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fireice 00:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should look at exactly what I was doing. I took the list of beverages from that paragraph and made it into a list at the bottom of the page, to make the page look cleaner. Please do your homework before accusing people falsely. I'm taking the list out again, because there's no reason for that list to be put in the article twice. Moving this to La Bicyclette's user talk page, because I'm La Bicyclette, and I'm silly for not signing in. La Bicyclette 00:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Next time please provide edit summary - when I reverted your edit [1] it seemed like a removed paragraph by anonymous user, therefore I assumed vandalism. Fireice 01:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do.La Bicyclette 03:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

A {{prod}} template has been added to the articles Alpha Omega (game) and Ethan Haas Was Right, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but these articles may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notices explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletions by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on the talk pages. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the articles may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where they may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Percy Snoodle 12:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing tag. There was no reason given by the tag-adder as to why this article should be deleted. Contest this at will.

AfD nomination of Alpha Omega (game)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Alpha Omega (game), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Omega (game). Thank you. Percy Snoodle 10:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of AfD tag

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ethan Haas Was Right. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Deor 17:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion being made. It does not have its own page. The page links to Alpha Omega, which has a link to the old, already-voted-upon AfD page for EHWR. The tag doesn't belong there. Removing it is not vandalism, it is removing a tag that was improperly placed.La Bicyclette 03:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is, and it does. The two articles have been nominated together. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list multiple related pages for deletion. Percy Snoodle 09:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]