User talk:LaGuairabeach

Welcome!

Hi LaGuairabeach! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fahads1982 (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm R Prazeres. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alcázar of Seville, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you are translating material from a non-English Wikipedia, make sure you are also including and adapting the citations used in the original material. If the content you are copying from does not include citations to reliable sources, it is most likely not appropriate to be copied into other articles at the moment. Thank you, R Prazeres (talk) 02:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You want sources on everything my friend, I will provide sources for that section I added and I will add as I translate the whole article, today I will go back to the version I left and add reliable sources like books to the new sections.

The article in the spanish version have sources of books written in spanish, some can be seen online, but I am going to add is sources of books written by english speaking authors, much more suitable for this wikipedia, if I can, if not I will add spanish ones.--LaGuairabeach (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cuenca, Ecuador. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Equal width (C) 02:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Criollo people, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrLegacyVideoMaker666 16:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santiago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Could you read over WP:Gallery pls.

Images make Wikipedia more informative, accessible, and professional.

In general, when working with images:

DO:
Review the image style guide and use policy.
Give context with captions and alt text.
Try to find at least one image for each article.
Find free images, or create and upload your own.
Clean up images: crop, color-correct, etc.
Use the best file format for each image.
Use objects for scale where helpful.
Place images in the section to which they are related

DON'T:
Don't upload non-free images.
Don't use images in place of tables or charts.
Don't use images or galleries excessively.
Don't add images that are not relevant.
Don't flip faces, text, or works of art.
Don't set fixed image sizes.
Don't sandwich text between two images.
Don't refer to images by their placement.
Don't place images too early or at the end of sections.

Moxy- 00:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my friend, then I'm going to move to a new page called List of historical paintings depicting the common Italian people, because I consider it very important for material and a good resource to know the poor and common people that existed in Italy in its history, and also a page for the Russians. What do you think, I think that this time it is possible.--LaGuairabeach (talk) 01:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my area of interest, but from a general Wikipedia editing perspective, making a list of paintings by the nationality/ethnicity of the people depicted in them doesn't seem very necessary and is possibly not appropriate. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists first, which outlines the criteria for what constitutes an appropriate list article, as well as general formatting guidelines. You would also need to cite reliable sources verifying that the subjects depicted in the paintings are of that nationality (except perhaps for self-evident cases, if applicable). R Prazeres (talk) 02:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks my friend I'm going to try my best, thanks for giving me a little chance to create the article, I'll look in textbooks, see if I can find support and information, thanks for trying to understand, do well my friend, I'm going to get to work on this, and hopefully you can help me improve the article, or let me do or reconsider. Thanks dude, have a good day LaGuairabeach (talk) 02:29, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@R Prazeres: Hi Friend, here it is, you can see how I'm doing if you want, you have to accept that I'm now doing well, I try to put my best effort :). User:LaGuairabeach/Draft: List of historical paintings depicting the common Italian people.--LaGuairabeach (talk) 05:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 00:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]