User talk:La9810

This account has been blocked indefinitely because its owner is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage)

Sources required

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, La9810, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pinkadelica ^♣ 23:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to The Room (film) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Additionally, please cite a reliable source when adding content to articles. Pinkadelica ^♣ 23:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Sestero Book

You need to stop putting this on his Wikipedia page. Wiki has a policy against "crystal ball" statements, that is, statements that talk about what someone might or might not do in the future. If you continue to put it on there I will report it as vandalism (which I am loathe to do but this needs to stay out). Wikipedia:CRYSTAL Bobbyandbeans (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Sestero Page

Are you having difficulty understanding how to create a Wiki page properly, or are you purposely vandalizing that page? If you keep adding in links to random articles that aren't references and other inappropriate information, you'll be reported as vandalizing and you'll be blocked permanently. (This isn't just by me but what you're doing will get the attention of the bots and other users who won't try to warn you about it.) If you're having difficulty understanding what is appropriate and what isn't, please post it here or on his Discussion page and it can be explained and worked out. I'd like Greg to have a nice page as well but you can't violate Wiki policies in the process.Bobbyandbeans (talk) 17:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who you are or if you're even getting these messages on your discussion page, but I'm in the process of redoing Greg's page from scratch so all the right information can be included properly and according to Wiki standards, including the proposed book. Greg also just sent me a pic to include on the page so I'll forward that to Media and get it approved. If you want to just hold off on editing his page for a week or so I'll probably have it done by then. If you have any questions or anything, put it here or on his Discussion page or even on my own Discussion page.Bobbyandbeans (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.You need to stop putting in promotional opinions and statements and removing other users' contributions for no reason. This is not your personal page to promote as you see fit.Bobbyandbeans (talk) 14:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Do not delete sourced information from articles with discussing or explaining your edits. Continuing to do this may get you blocked from editing. Please stop. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe Quinn

Was there a reason for you deleting a paragraph relating to Loveshack Entertainment? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starly396 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Disaster Artist, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Superbad and Neighbors. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, La9810. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Best F(r)iends, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, La9810. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Best F(r)iends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Room (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Paul Scheer

Is there any particular reason you're so committed to erasing Paul Scheer from the Best F(r)iends page? If you believe there's an issue with the way that article covers his involvement, perhaps we can discuss a better way to feature him, but it seems dishonest to pretend he wasn't involved at all. I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt before assuming this is just repeated vandalism. Boycool (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 20:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/La9810, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Swarm ♠ 23:21, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]