User talk:L Glidewell
| This is L Glidewell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]Dear L Glidewell: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:
- Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Community Portal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- How to edit a page
- How to revert to a previous version of a page
- Tutorial
- Copyrights
- Shortcuts
Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! KP Botany 21:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
References
[edit]The original was: [http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/h_multi_sections_and_teasers/Photo_Exhibit_African_American_Senators.htm U.S. Senate: Art & History Home] I changed it to: U.S. Senate: Art & History Home
In the edit box it looks the same, but yours has a carriage return or line feed after the .htm link. Those links will not work with a line feed in them. I just put the cursor in front of U.S. and backspaced until it was right next to the .htm, then hit space ensuring that only one space was there not a line feed and a space. It's a pretty common thing, I think it's happened to me before. --Dual Freq 02:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 03:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Seattle
[edit]Don't bite the newcomers, right? About Seattle, actually, it doesn't rain all year. It has two seasons -- rain and no rain. The rain lasts from September or October until March or April. This is Seattle's best kept secret -- the weather is fantastic in the summer. I'm not going to reinstate the statement you deleted, because (as regards my experience with Italy) the summer is mild, not (so very...) hot, and the winter is pretty cold, if above freezing, thereby making the "Mediterranean Climate" label inappropriate (Northern California is Mediterranean). But still. ...Zweifel 06:44, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Illinois
[edit]Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to external image in Illinois. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source.
Per WP:IMAGES Images on external sites can no longer be linked inline due to several reasons: inline linking to images on other sites is often considered "leeching" and is thus rude; allowing online image linking makes it easier for vandals to post images from shock sites; external images are often unreliable and may sometimes be removed by the webmasters.
Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information--JoeSmack Talk 02:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- My response, on JoeSmack's talk page:
Personally, I consider it rather rude of you to respond to my request for an explanation with a vague template. That said, I do not understand why you object to this link. On my browser, it does not appear as an inline image-link. If this is an idiosyncracy of my browser, I ask your forgiveness. Still, I ask you in the future to recognize that not all browsers function in the same way, and that this fact necessitates a more thorough explanation of your choice to revert an editorial change.
Again: I did not make the original change. I reverted your edit because you provided no explanation. Please assume good faith. User:L Glidewell 03:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hi there; im sorry, but linking an image via a link as opposed to trying to lace it in as to be viewed in an article are a hair different, but the template is the same reasoning. It cannot be guaranteed that the image should be use (licensing, a free version in the commons is the way to go) and every time someone clicks the link it leeches their bandwidth all the same. I absolutely assume good faith, understand that not all browsers function in the same way, and sorry if my first response via a template felt crass. My apologies. For these reasons however, I am reverting this link from the article. JoeSmack Talk 03:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hi--Okay, I understand now. I'd only add that--to my understanding--an "inline image" and a direct link to an image are different things. But, your reasoning makes perfect sense. Thanks for the explanation. Best, User:L Glidewell 03:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- They are, you're right. Thanks for working this out! :) JoeSmack Talk 03:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey, please allow me to do with my talk page as I like. You can do the same for yours if you want to. JoeSmack Talk 05:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
CHICOTW nominee
[edit]See new procedures. TonyTheTiger 21:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- I know 25 words is an arbitrary #. If you posted less than 30 I would edit myself to make it consistent. Note that these 25 words will go into posterity when we archive the votes. Please reedit for length. Use sentence fragments if necessary. TonyTheTiger 01:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- I wikified The Second City assuming this is your reference. If a problem correct. TonyTheTiger 01:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
CHICOTW
[edit]We missed you this week. I see you were not too active on WP in general. Of course, you are under no obligation to stop by, but every hand is welcome. TonyTheTiger 20:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Even though we missed you this week, as one of our founding reformation members, you are recieving the following
|
| |
|
You voted for the Chicago Collaboration of the week, and Near South Side, Chicago has been chosen. Please help improve it to raise it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see a list of open tasks.
| ||
|
| |
I apologize if you feel spammed. If we do not hear from you this week, we will not bother you in the future. TonyTheTiger 00:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
CHICOTW GAonhold
[edit]|
|
| |
|
You were a contributing editor to Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago during its tenure as CHICOTW. It has been placed on Good article on hold status thanks in part to your efforts. See its GA review and help us raise it towards the featured article classification level. The article was given good article on hold status on February 2, 2007. It will be reevaluated in between 2 and 7 days from this date. Recall that during its tenure as CHICOTW we achieved the following Improvement. See our CHICOTW Improvement History.
| ||
|
| ||
.svg) |
| |
TonyTheTiger 20:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
GA Notice
[edit]|
|
| |
|
You were a contributing editor to Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago during its tenure as CHICOTW. It has successfully achieved Good article status thanks in part to your efforts. See its GA review and help us raise it towards the featured article classification level. Recall that during its tenure as CHICOTW we achieved the following Improvement. See our CHICOTW Improvement History.
| ||
|
| ||
 |
| |
TonyTheTiger 19:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
CHICOTW GA notice
[edit]|
|
| |
|
You were a contributing editor to Washington Park, Chicago during its tenure as CHICOTW. Washington Park, Chicago (park) has successfully achieved Good article status thanks in part to your efforts. See its GA review and help us raise it towards the featured article classification level. Recall that during its tenure as CHICOTW we achieved the following improvement. See our CHICOTW Improvement History.
| ||
|
| ||
|
| |
TonyTheTiger 19:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Editorial assistance
[edit]I apologize for not recognizing you earlier. I am just getting familiar with this type of userbox. You may want to place the following on your user page:
| This user helped promote Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago to good article status. |
TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO survey
[edit] | Hi, thank you for being a member of WP:CHICAGO. If you would like to remain as an active member please note so here, otherwise mark yourself inactive or semi-active. Thank you. If active, put "Active in project since MM/YYYY. Active as of MM/YYYY" where MM and YYYY represent approximate time you joined the project. Make sure anyone you think is active in the project has signed up on the project page and the last time you confirmed your activity.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC) |
WP:CHICAGO
[edit]You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago GAR
[edit]Please contribute your thoughts to Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago/1 to discuss its recent delisting from WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)