User talk:LUO7AN

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Charice Pempengco, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 22:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Regine Velasquez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 22:17, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are biased. I did that because I discovered earlier that someone posted this on Regine Velasquez' wikipedia profile.

For real Filipino world-class talent, with worldwide ground-breaking achievements and effortless high and
low notes that the failed and flopping Regine Velasquez has and NEVER will
achieve, see Charice.

I AM a Regine Velasquez fan and I fount it very rude... I wonder why you noticed my post immediately when perhaps the message above has been displayed on Regine Velasquez' wikipedia page for some time now.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Moon-sunrise, you will be blocked from editing. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 22:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Moon-sunrise. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. No one is being biased. If you saw the post you should have just removed it instead of vandalizing the pages. And FYI, I'm not a fan of Charice. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 22:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Alex (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LUO7AN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You should be blocking the one who keep on posting vandalisms. I'm just reverting it back.

Decline reason:

I cannot find any evidence you are actually blocked. Perhaps you're on the same IP as the user you were reverting? (whom I did, in fact, just block) — Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In fact, the user who posted the block notice isn't even an admin. I will talk to him about this. Daniel Case (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! You got blocked! OWNED

Poor Regine Velasquez fan! :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.26.207 (talk) 05:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]