User talk:LR23

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, LR23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of B4blaze

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on B4blaze requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 18:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Drewmutt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent contributions to Online journalism in India because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation

Your addition to Serendipity Arts Foundation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Bensci54 (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. Minus a few innocuous edits, you seem largely here[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] to drive traffic to b4blaze.com. And in some cases, like here and here, your contributions just reek of paid editing, which you would be required to disclose per WP:PAID. And it's also clear that some of what you contributed you copy/pasted, introducing plagiarism and copyright violations at Wikipedia. So between your spamming/advertising and your total lack of awareness about plagiarism or copyright violations, you leave me with little choice but to block your account.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LR23 (talk) 17:27, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LR23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, actully i don't know about this, I have subscribed to the news of that website so when i see new articles, i tried to tag that in wiki page for more references. it not by any other type of promotions or paid. Now i know my mistake and i will not take reference from same website and i will choose different websites for references. Please allow me to edit more contents and create more articles. Thanks for the information. LR23 (talk) 17:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on your additions of promotional and copyrighted content, alongside the single-minded linkspam strategy, I simply don't believe you. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing administrator: Please note the promotional articles created at Serendipity Arts Festival and B4blaze, both of which likely contain copyright violations as well, for instance, in the Serendipity article, I see content copied from this website about Goa's airport. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LR23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know why you don't believe, I checked the owner of BuzzFeed and I found it on the wiki also I searched for b4blaze I didn't find Even a page so I created the page that was my 1st page, 2nd Serendipity Arts Festival how can I be related to this? if I have any connection I may add reference link from b4blaze for that article too. Believe me, I don't have any relation with all of this. I have chats screenshots I asked to some of my FB tech friends about why Buzzfeed showing in the wiki and not b4blaze likewise. If you can give email id, I can give all details via mail. I'm 100% genuine I'm not here for any paid activity or spam. I can prove anywhere I don't have any connection with any of the team as said how can I be connected? I have updated more than 100+ links for reference in that 10 of them is from my subscribed website that is natural. I can prove my statement anywhere so admin give a valid reason for the block of my account.

Decline reason:

Per below. MER-C 16:25, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you, but I don't think anyone will be interested in your screencaps. The valid reason for your block is for spamming Wikipedia with links to b4blaze.com, which you have done here and there since 2017, whether perniciously or not. B4blaze.com, a blog, wouldn't even be sufficient under our reliable sources guidelines, and in a world where there are many legitimate mainstream Indian news outlets, I find it dubious that you are so heavily reliant on one random blog as the source of most of your information. Further, the Serendipity Arts Festival article read like advertising text, and some of it, like what I noted above, was copied verbatim from other sources, which is unacceptable anywhere in academia. If you are serious about being unblocked, you need to be able to convince a reviewing administrator that you understand what is problematic about spam, and that you also explain why copying or close paraphrasing is unacceptable. Admins would also be curious to know how you plan to contribute at Wikipedia if you were unblocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LR23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very serious about my Wikipedia account. Not just screenshots I can even share the login credentials if needed for a detailed check. I'm a film lover and I work with famous directors as an associate for more than 8 years. whenever I watch movies I will check wiki for more details and if something is missing which I know, then I will add all those details. Everybody will search the wiki for more details of a film and I'm very much interested to update every detail I know. Now I understand the mistake of irrelevant references like B4blaze.com and I understand the copyright policies now. I was really unaware of those things. If you give a chance I will add only main stream reference if needed and also I will never ever copy anything as I understand completely the copyright policies. I accept the things from Cyphoidbomb I'm not a technical guy and I was unaware of the things and now I know clearly about my mistake. I'm very much interested to contribute more from the industry I work with, allow me one last chance to add more informative content to Wikipedia. LR23 (talk) 03:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Serendipity Arts Festival

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Serendipity Arts Festival, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

{{unblock |I'm very serious about my Wikipedia account. I can provide proof if needed, not just screenshots valid proofs supporting my statement. I'm a film lover and I work with famous directors as an associate for more than 8 years. whenever I watch movies I will check wiki for more details and if something is missing which I know, then I will add all those details. Everybody will search the wiki for more details of a film and I'm very much interested to update every detail I know. Now I understand the mistake of irrelevant references like B4blaze.com and I understand the copyright policies now. I was really unaware of those things. If you give a chance I will add only mainstream reference if needed and also I will never ever copy anything as I understand completely the copyright policies.I'm very much interested to contribute more from the industry I work with, allow me one last chance to add more informative content to Wikipedia. [[User:LR23|LR23]] ([[User talk:LR23#top|talk]]) 05:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)}}

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labeled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | Hi Admins, Please check my request and unblock, by the way now only I checked the admin who blocked me. We both work in the same industry Malayalam film [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] I told you it's not knowingly done all those mistakes and if you allow me a chance. I will never ever make such mistakes and I'm not a technical guy. But I'm very much interested to contribute good content to Wikipedia from the industry I work with. Requesting again to check and unblock. I can give any no of valid proof stating my words. Or else give me a solution to contribute to Wikipedia if you are not unblocking my account, do i need to create another account or how ?. I'm very much interested to contribute to Wikipedia from the field I work with.[[User:LR23|LR23]] ([[User talk:LR23#top|talk]]) 06:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)}}

You've only made 28 contributions to Wikipedia from 2017 to 2019, so I don't know how "serious", you can be. Of those 28 edits, a significant portion seem to exist to drive traffic to one website, b4blaze.com.[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. That said, I would be willing to endorse an unblock if you agree not to use improper references going forward (see WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a rough example of sites generally considered appropriate or not in the context of Indian entertainment), stay away from blogs and other faceless websites. You would also need to agree not to create articles about anything even remotely promotional. Anything that looks like a brand new company or a brand new event or anything for which there is not significant coverage in mainstream publications. This means that if you create an article about a subject, mainstream publications have to talk in detail about that subject--who's behind it, when was it established, how it came to be developed, etc. No press releases.

I'll also point out that you opened your last unblock request right in the middle of my last post. You will need to exercise care going forward. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LR23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sure, Now I understand my mistake very clearly and I will never ever add such kind of references and I will only create very essential contents only, Thanks for informing the guidelines, I will follow all the rules and you can check my future updates if unblocked. I'm very much interested to contribute very good content to Wikipedia.Cyphoidbomb you can watch my all updates, I'm sure will follow all the guidelines. LR23 (talk) 11:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please also note you had three open unblock requests. This is abusive and you may lose talk page access if you do that again. --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]