User talk:LIXIAO9987

Welcome!

Hi LIXIAO9987! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--MarioGom (talk) 10:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Shi Zhengli

Your recent editing history at Shi Zhengli shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -Thucydides411 (talk) 17:10, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your most recent addition: [1]. Ramming text through against other editors' objections is not how things are supposed to work on Wikipedia. Also, please note that accusations of vandalism, such as the one you made in this edit summary, violate WP:AGF. "Vandalism" does not refer to content disputes. -Thucydides411 (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Nature article is a high quality source referencing her past work. There is no reason to supress this information beyond bias. LIXIAO9987 (talk) 21:06, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, nobody is suppressing the Nature article. Second of all, even if they were, edit warring is not allowed. You've put essentially the same text into the article more than three times within 24 hours, in violation of WP:3RR. This is a bright line that editors are not supposed to cross. When an editor violates 3RR, it is considered courteous to ask them to undo their own edits, instead of immediately reporting them to WP:AN/3RR. I'm therefore asking you to undo your last addition. You need to discuss your proposed changes on the talk page. Give WP:BRD a read to see how you should proceed when other editors object to your additions. -Thucydides411 (talk) 21:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are suppressing this information by including the source with NO mention of the contents of the source. Repeated removals are unwarranted. Britishfinance also agrees it should be added. You're trying to turn this into a debate about coronavirus when the subject is her previous work. The current pandemic bears no relevance on the contents of the Nature article.LIXIAO9987 (talk) 22:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BLP notice

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Shi Zhengli. Thank you. -Thucydides411 (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

The following sanction has been imposed on you:

You are blocked from editing the article Shi Zhengli and its talk page Talk:Shi Zhengli, for one month.

You have been sanctioned for your continued pushing of claims which are fringe views not supported by mainstream science and not supported by the balance of reliable sources at this time, and making improperly supported allegations against the subject of a WP:BLP article. Please take the time to make sure you understand the general sanctions described at WP:GS/COVID19 and the need for reliable sources, described at WP:RS and WP:MEDRS, and please read WP:NPOV and understand what we mean by balance here at Wikipedia. If your disruption continues when this block expires, you will face further sanctions.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at WP:GS/COVID19, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]