User talk:L-native

Hello, L-native and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 17:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

November 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Jacobs University Bremen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 18:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: How long will be a reason I need to provide? It seems you have undo all changes I have made gradually, probably without read the page itself? ---- Mr. L (Talk / Contrib) 18:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi L-native, Good day. You could just provide as short brief info on the summary edit. If you removed a sourced content and will rewrite the content (make sure with inline citation), then just put, remove content and will rewrite with source on next edit - so we could check on your next edit you have done so. You can re-paste your edits my edit and stated the conversation we have here and do remember to leave edit summary next time. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 18:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Actually the change you mentioned was an reorganization, not a removal. I thought it's tiny, so I didn't write anything to describe. I was going to put it in another section. I am not sure how to re-do the changes and write a summary now. It was many works. Do you mean I should write something in Edit summary, even after editing this conversation? ---- Mr. L (Talk / Contrib) 00:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jacobs University Bremen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graduate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DPL bot: Thank you for your reminder. I have fixed the links. ---- Mr. L^{(talk/contribs)} 15:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schaft

There is no need to have a disambiguation hatnote that links to a red article because it leads the reader nowhere. Other editors will remove it because they assume the article has been deleted. Write it first, and then you can link to it. ... discospinster _talk 14:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Discospinster:, I understand your point. However, I was not able to find a way to create new page without a red article link. This is the cause. Thank you for your reminder. ---- Mr. L^{(talk/contribs)} 15:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At WP:Your first article is a method you can use to create a new article from scratch. You can also search for the title, and if it's not found there will be a note at the top saying You may create the page "[John Q. Redlink]". ... discospinster _talk 15:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Discospinster:. The situation is I have searched and there is no creating the page function any more. Yes, I found them in the past. And the pages are deleted by wikipedia now. ---- Mr. L^{(talk/contribs)} 22:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SCHAFT (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SCHAFT (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 15:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi:, Hi. You are very efficient by deleting. I don't even understand why it is not notable enough. ---- Mr. L^{(talk/contribs)} 22:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]