User talk:KzKrann

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KzKrann (talk) 23:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

This is precisely why I've never tried using tools like Twinkle. Thanks for giving us a laugh :-) More seriously, thanks for doing your best to clean it up immediately. Nyttend (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took the problem to ANI in order to get it handled as quickly as possible

Please take note of WP:ANI#Accidental AFD of Brain. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nominations

It is mandatory that nominators cite the reason(s) as to why they feel the article should be deleted. This helps voters know what your concerns may be. Additionally, I noticed that you simply cited "non-notable" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dörarp. When I nominate an article, I always attempt to give a lengthy explanation as to why I feel the article should be deleted including displaying the sources I may have found. If I haven't found any sources, I'll mention this with "I have found zero sources to establish notability or verification". Generally, I'll use Google News, Google News archives and Google Books to search for sources. If you need inspiration, view my recent nominations, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical Black Press Foundation and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etheric Networks. If you need help, feel free to contact me at my talk page. SwisterTwister talk 02:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Martin Zografski

The article Martin Zografski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 20:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Evgeniy Klimov (ski jumper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Evgeniy Klimov (ski jumper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 14:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm STATicVerseatide. I noticed that you made a change to an article, WrestleMania 29, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 00:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rey Astral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rey Astral.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rey Astral.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rey Astral for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rey Astral is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rey Astral until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KzKrann (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KzKrann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I must have been hacked or something. If you check my earlier edits you will know I am not a vandal

Decline reason:

We'll have to keep this account blocked, then, in the event that it becomes compromised again. only (talk) 03:16, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Sonicblue Airways Flight 604 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonicblue Airways Flight 604 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonicblue Airways Flight 604 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skokanské Můstky (Bresno)

The article Skokanské Můstky (Bresno) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable ski jumping hill

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]