User talk:Kypickle

July 2023

I notice you've edited a number of articles on exoplanets given proper names through NameExoWorlds to change almost every instance of their designation to their proper name. Please don't do this; in most cases the designation is the more common name which is why it's the article title. If you think the proper name should be the article title you can open a move request, though I'd note there's already general consensus against this. SevenSpheres (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason the designation is more common is because the official names aren't used. That's what I'm trying to change. I'll stop, but I don't agree with it. Kypickle (talk) 15:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where the Wikipedia: namespace page about this is, but if you want to change something editing Wikipedia isn't the way to do it. I have seen some exoplanet names being used by sources outside of the IAU, usually along with the designation, but even for many stars with traditional names the designation is more common. SevenSpheres (talk) 15:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

alright, i had an idea

(sorry it took me so long to respond, I forgot lol)

so I agree with you now, we should keep the code name designation in the article, but also I think the proper name should be represented a bit more, so I had an idea

How about at the planet box at the top, where it says the planet's name (not the title, the box at the side where it says information about the planet) and, for example, instead of saying just "55 cancri e" we said 55 Cancri e / Janssen? that way, the more common designation can still be used, but the proper name is also given more representation, since both names are equally official according to the IAU and should be treated as such. Kypickle (talk) 20:22, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

so essentially what I want is at the planet box where it says the name of the planet and information about it, there should be the "code" name as well as the proper name, with a slash in the middle to separate them. Alternatively, we could use parenthesis, like this:

55 Cancri e (Janssen)

but i thought this design wasn't as good as it didn't make it seem like both names were equal. Also, I wouldn't change anything else, and the article itself would still use the more common designation. So, whatever name is more common will be used in the article itself, but both names will be represented without having to change the article title. Kypickle (talk) 20:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WD 0806-661 b has been accepted

WD 0806-661 b, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:LTT 9779 b has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:LTT 9779 b. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:41, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LTT 9779 b has been accepted

LTT 9779 b, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WASP-49b (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at WASP-49. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

this is already covered by the WASP-49 article. Please issue a split request and discussion if you feel it is independently notable from that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WASP-49b and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kypickle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:WASP-49b

Hello, Kypickle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:WASP-49b, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:WASP-49b

Hello, Kypickle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "WASP-49b".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]