Inferno en flame

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Inferno en flame, by Cyrus XIII, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Inferno en flame fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Virtually no content, created with fraudulent semi-protection tag.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Inferno en flame, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Inferno en flame itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:2kk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2kk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:HIMMigeAmour1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HIMMigeAmour1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ghg.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ghg.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rare-190x191.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rare-190x191.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:KopievonHIM8.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KopievonHIM8.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Mikkolindstrom.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mikkolindstrom.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rare and Live Tracks

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Rare and Live Tracks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lolita23q

A tag has been placed on Lolita23q requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 20:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Artofdying-band.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Artofdying-band.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Band article deletion

Hi. The band simply doesn't meet the extremely high level of notability required for inclusion. WP:BAND can explain in detail. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The timestamp is automatic and it's set to UTC, not local time. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; just doing my job. Myspace doesn't count as a verifiable third-party source. You're free to request an undeletion at Wikipedia:Articles for undeletion. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's a volunteer gig. No cash. :) What you need to do is to edit here for awhile, create a few good articles and perhaps assist in the creation of a feature article. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dan S.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dan S.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to File:Dan S.jpg. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Marek.69 ^talk 22:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dan S.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dan S.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly note

Your creation of Gender Confused Male and your recent edits to Chris Crocker (Internet celebrity) appear to constitute vandalism. Are you planning to make similar edits in the future? It would save me time to just indefinitely block you now, if that's the case. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Watchout! There's Ghosts

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Watchout! There's Ghosts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Krazycev 13 ^{other crap} 22:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

=

The Reason i didn't give an explanation is because i don't know how to give one.

You should have read the speedy deletion notification. You write it on the talk page. But the page got deleted. Too late.--Krazycev 13 ^{other crap} 16:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1991d82284ebaf8ce7c54301f09d0d82.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1991d82284ebaf8ce7c54301f09d0d82.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Envelop3.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Envelop3.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Your image uploads

I have deleted your image uploads. Taking images from elsewhere and claiming them as your own is not only completely contrary to Wikipedia's policies and goals, but is potentially illegal. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. J Milburn (talk) 12:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of America Underwater (song)

The article America Underwater (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]