User talk:Kyo Aston

Stop please

Please stop your reverts which make no sense and are unexplained Dr Salvus 12:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are reverting vandalism. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to user talk:q28. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Q28 (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read the above very carefully. M.Bitton (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted, and duly ignored. There was never any doubt that I was going to lose the popularity contest in being a recent changes patroller, and I'm certainly not going to fold just because some disgruntled editors can't handle being put in their place. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic the Hedgehog (disambiguation)

@Kyo Aston: (talk) I can assure you that indeed there is a protein named Sonic hedgehog as can be seen by following the link. Please retract the vandalism warning from my talk page. Thank you, Facts707 (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Calling b.s on that one I'm afraid. So no, I will not retract the vandalism warning. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how you can "call b.s." when Sonic hedgehog (the protein) is clearly a well-established and well-referenced article. Facts707 (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Trincão

Good morning, from Portugal,

false vandalism accusation, been here for 15 years and i take great pride in fighting vandalism in all its forms. No worries, now the player's height is listed at 1,88 with a source that reads 1,83!

Happy 2022 --193.137.135.2 (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check again... Kyo Aston (talk) 12:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check what, if you please? --193.137.135.2 (talk) 12:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 12:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyo Aston (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please review my edits - they were all as part of a counter-vandalism effort, hindered by having to respond to the many unfounded grievances and complaints seen on my talk page. This is a particularly clear cut case of editors banding together to harass and disparage someone who is trying to protect the site from vandals. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think we can do without this protection. 331dot (talk) 15:36, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would also recommend that GiantSnowman receive a short punitive block (e.g. ~2/3 days) to allow them to cool off. Kyo Aston (talk) 12:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To the reviewing admin - this editor has been reverting and templating good faith edit/editors. They were brought to my attention here. Their response to my helpful advice was to template me with a level 4 vandalism warning and to remove my comment from an entirely unrelated disucssion. They are clearly a sock/troll/vandal. Giant Snowman 12:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: - you recently blocked High professionalism (talk · contribs). I think this slightly older account, which I had already blocked, is the same editor. I have tagged accordingly. Giant Snowman 13:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: Yes, it looks the same to me, too. There seems to be a rash of them. Take a look at the deleted edits of the one I blocked and the history. Maybe it's an end-of-the-year blitz. I've revoked TPA for this account.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:44, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]