User talk:KylieK
|
This user talk page has been protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from using the {{unblock}} template to relay abusive messages to administrators or reposting it after having been denied an unblock by more than one admin. If you have come here to issue a new warning to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here. |
Kylie K
[edit]
KylieK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked for being a sockpuppet which is untrue, i and another user have a similar interest and because of this i am blocked, there is not even any evidence to suggest that i am a sock puppet, and a page i created has been deleted for no reason.
Decline reason:
Obvious sock, like several earlier ones. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
[edit]KylieK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Could someone please review my block, (other than the above user, as they obviously have bias) There is not one peice of evidence to suggest that i am a sockpuppet, none at all, not even the administrator who blocked me can come up with a reason. I will admit that i did create an article with the same name, but different information (that had previously been deleted) that a previous blocked user created originally, but that's not evidence in my opinion, it just means we both have one similar interest, and regardless of anything else wikipedia is better off with the article i created, and the article i created was deleted for no reason (F.Y.I the article was Sports trainer). I have been blocked because someone assumes that i am a sock, there is no evidence, and my account (KylieK) has not done anything wrong at all, i just created an article like any other user, and i worked for hours, really hard and researched heaps to create that article and for no reason it was deleted, how do you think that makes me feel? and then to have my account blocked, which means i can't even appeal the deletion. Please unblock my account and let me get on with trying to re-create the article, if you decide not to unblock please provide a good reason and evidence, because in my opinion there is none. Thank you (Kylie 22:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC))
Decline reason:
How do you know it was different given the article was deleted 3 says before you created this account? Though a quick look an they look the same to me. No. --pgk 22:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I read the article before i created the account, you don't need an account to read articles, and they are different, the wording, different pictures! (Kylie 23:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC))
Requesting unblock
[edit]KylieK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Could someone please review my block, There is not one peice of evidence to suggest that i am a sockpuppet, none at all, not even the administrator who blocked me can come up with a reason. I will admit that i did create an article with the same name, and similar information but it was different in some ways, (that had previously been deleted) that a previous blocked user created originally, but that's not evidence in my opinion, it just means we both have one similar interest, and regardless of anything else wikipedia is better off with the article i created, and the article i created was deleted for no reason (F.Y.I the article was Sports trainer). I have been blocked because someone assumes that i am a sock, there is no evidence, and my account (KylieK) has not done anything wrong at all, i just created an article like any other user, and i worked for hours, really hard and researched heaps to create that article and for no reason it was deleted, how do you think that makes me feel? and then to have my account blocked, which means i can't even appeal the deletion. Please unblock my account and let me get on with trying to re-create the article, if you decide not to unblock please provide a good reason and evidence, because in my opinion there is none. Finally, the reason that i am again requesting unblocking, is because on my last requests the administrator still does not list any evidence to suggest i am a sock, please refer to my talk page to see the other requests. Thank you (Kylie 23:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC))
Decline reason:
They are more or less identical with large chunks exactly the same. You don't get to decide if wikipedia is better with your article, the fact that it has been deleted several times by several admins should maybe be taken as a hint. Requesting to be unblocked so you can further recreate is a non-starter. No. --pgk 23:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.