User talk:Kyletroyyy
AfD nomination of Haiti organ harvesting
[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Haiti organ harvesting. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haiti organ harvesting. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Haiti organ harvesting
[edit]Hello Kyletroyyy, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Haiti organ harvesting, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Breein1007. This has been done because the page is a recently created article that that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Breein1007. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Breein1007 (talk · contribs) 06:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
April 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page 2009 Aftonbladet Israel controversy has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEfELgav1Qs, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUlZBo8V1dk. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2009 Aftonbladet Israel controversy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop your vandalistic, biased edits that are not supported by the sources given. Wikipedia is not a place to promote fringe, malicious claims. Next them this happens, you will be reported to an administrator. Plot Spoiler (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2010 (UTC)