User talk:Kylests
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Second Virginia Charter, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/D/1601-1650/virginia/chart02.htm. As a copyright violation, Second Virginia Charter appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Second Virginia Charter has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Second Virginia Charter. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Second Virginia Charter, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
See the talk page. -- RHaworth 22:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Alpsius
[edit]A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Alpsius, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Alpsius, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B1atv 23:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
January 2008
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Vancouver. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
[edit]
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Vancouver. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Dadude3320 16:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to God. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 16:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)