User talk:Kyleandrewblake

Welcome

Hello, Kyleandrewblake! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 17:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gordon Brown with the Spirit of London Awards.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gordon Brown with the Spirit of London Awards.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 20:57, 1 December 2012 (UT

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:David Cameron speaks to SOLA.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:David Cameron speaks to SOLA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Spirit of London Awards - Downing Street.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Spirit of London Awards - Downing Street.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright of images you are adding

You do not own the copyright of the images you are adding. If you look at the page that documents the images you can see its metadata. Your photo of Cameron, for instance, states;

Image title LONDON, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 19: attends a reception hosted by David Cameron ahead of the Spirit Of London Awards at 10 Downing Street on September 19, 2011 in London, United Kingdom. (Photo by Dave J Hogan/Getty Images)

Copyright holder 2011 Getty Images

Author Stringer, Dave J Hogan

This means that these images are copyright Getty Images and you do not own the rights to release them for use on Wikipedia.

--Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:45, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So why is their copyright on it? It also matters little whether they own it or "Spirit of London Awards" own it. You cannot release it under Commons licensing while still claiming copyright of it. You can't say one thing on Flikr, and another on Wikipedia.

My apologies for deleting everything you had done, I didn't realise you had added more than just the photos, but I should have checked. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 00:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. You should read Wikipedia policy on images as I'm afraid you are likely to have further problems uploading images as long as they retain copyright notices belonging to others. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 00:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am speaking to their copyright department at the moment, It does not matter if a different name is on it, it is about if you paid to own it and we have. Like is said papers do the same thing, they own all the images printed but the photographer gets credit for taking the photo --Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After one month of owning the copyright we allow our picture to be in the public domain, otherwise our young people cannot use them. The copyright ownership on flicker is probably because it has not been updated, that will be sorted out. But we do not claim copyright over those images anymore, but the person who took the photo still needs to be credited which is why their name is on it, but they have no claim to copyright.--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are saying. The problem is that the image's metadata indicate that the photo agency Getty Images, not the photographer, claim ownership of them. This usually means that the photographer was working for Getty Images, or has sold them the rights. Yes the photographer can be credited, but it is the photo agency that owns the copyright. Getty Images never release the copyright on photos they own, it's what makes them their money. In fact they are known for aggressively defending their copyright. You'll need to demonstrate that you own the photos, and find out why their copyright is on them. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SOLO - Royal Albert Hall.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SOLO - Royal Albert Hall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We own the photo's the have been uploaded, I am a manager of the foundation with full authorisation from the managing director, our website is www.solofoundation.org.uk and we also have photos on other sites like http://www.flickr.com/photos/solaofficial/6165663707/sizes/m/in/photostream/. Before deleting please contact me at kyle@solafoundation.org.uk--Kyleandrewblake (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]