User talk:Kyalinrights

lin x kya y’all

January 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lin Beifong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 04:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lin Beifong, you may be blocked from editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 06:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damn son 🤧🤡 Kyalinrights (talk) 06:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyalinrights, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kyalinrights! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lin Beifong. Bennv3771 (talk) 03:43, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lin Beifong, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bennv3771 (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Kyalinrights per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kyalinrights. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cabayi (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyalinrights (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not affiliated w the stopchangingitcowards account. It is someone else. Y’all take this too seriously Kyalinrights (talk) 06:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - you are no longer blocked. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Samsara 14:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]