User talk:Kwort

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yan Bingliang. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yan Bingliang. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Acsian88 (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Yan Bingliang. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. 18:55, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Removing messages

Hi there. Please do not remove messages from other editors' talk pages, as this may prevent them from reading them. If you disagree with the content of the message then feel free to contest it by adding your comment below it, but removing it is disruptive and may lead to a block. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Regards Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 11:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 11:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Screw U

Don't think I don't know what that means. You only have yourself and your mindless foolish vandalising to blame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.28.150.125 (talk) 10:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incivility

Please read this: Wikipedia:No personal attacks

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Thank you for showing your true colours. I feel sorry for your parents who wasted money on you and people around you for having to contend with a arrogant, useless, brainless, uncouth, condescending low-life like you.

-Acsian88 (talk) 18:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, Acsian, do you realize that in the same post, you just directed an editor to read a policy against personal attacks and then went on to make an egregious attack against them? AutomaticStrikeout 17:51, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, read Wikipedia:Civility. Given you've already been blocked, and there's not much productive in your history, I've applied a longer block to your account. If you don't behave civilly when its over, expect it to become permanent. Wily D 09:16, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Given the evidence, I find it compelling that you're also User:Kwotkuku. Given the use of socking to continue a personal attack and issue threats, I've decided the most prudent thing to do is extend your block indefinitely. Wily D 09:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]