Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave comments, critiques, etc., below. Unless you specifically request that I answer on your talk page, I'll be answering here, as I prefer to keep as much of the conversation in one place as possible. Thanks!
NEW! The meaning of all this is that the 'startup' phase of the Java project is finished. The project now switches to its 'mature' phase. I encourage you to put your name in the todo page after one of the remaining tasks. You can also aim to be Coordinator if you so desire. (2010-05-13)
Great day kids! All 1482 Java pages are now importance-assessed. From now on, let's increase article quality! (2010-05-11)
We reached another important milestone: all 1450 Java pages are now quality-assessed. Let's finish importance assessment! (2010-04-25)
Hello guys and dolls, good news! Our second Cleanup listing is now available. So, no more excuses for laziness, let's get to work, all of us... (2010-03-24)
Totally awesome news! Our project was featured in this edition (2010-03-08) of the Wikipedia Signpost (2010-03-09)
Big news again, we now have 300 images within the project scope with more to come soon! (2010-03-02)
Great news folks! We recently got our first-ever Good Article rating. (2010-02-27)
Last month ranking stats for the WikiProject Java articles is here. (2010-02-01)
Current monthly ranking stats for the WikiProject Java articles is here. (2010-01-01)
Hello guys and dolls, good news! Our first meaningful Cleanup listing is now available. (2009-12-11)
Hi everybody! We just opened the WikiProject Java (and portal) for business. So enjoy! (2009-10-26)
Hello everybody! Now that we are at least 5 members, we are able to officialize this thing. Don't you think it would be great if each one of us proudly displayed his membership by placing the Java Userbox on its user (or talk) page... (2009-10-23)
Hi supporters of the WikiProject Java! And thanks for your support. Now that we are more than 5 supporters, I gather from the Wikipedia guidelines that we CAN proceed with the groundwork, for releasing the project and portal in the open soon. To that effect, we would appreciate it very much if you could copy your name in the List of participants page. (2009-10-23)
A tag has been placed on Template:Indian expressways requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Hi, I have reverted your all edits regarding expressways in India. I think it would be better if we discuss before deleting, changing template, I dont think its duplication to any template. It has its good look and feel, more aesthetically pleasing than the rather bland Template:infobox road, If you still feels this template is duplicate please start discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. KuwarOnlineTalk05:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion was opened at WT:INR, and when no comments were forthcoming, a test of the expressway articles was made, a test that you've rollbacked. The Indian templates violate MOS:FLAG by using the Indian flag at the top. Once the template was not in use, it was eligible for deletion under the CSD criteria T3 (not in use, and duplicates the function of another template). As for the look and feel, I disagree. {{Infobox road}} has been redesigned to work globally (almost 50 countries are supported), to comply with Accessbility guidelines, and to set up the color of the headers in the template to be customizable for any country. Autostrada A26 (Italy) will demonstrate that, as the Italian articles all use the same color green from the signage and the previous Italian infobox. The United States and Canada are switching to the shade of green that matches our guide signs, with brown as an option for historic and scenic highways. Canada is also going to use blue for their freeways. There are color schemes set up in the template to support the blue and yellow for Germany, or the blue/white, green/yellow and black/white of the United Kingdom. Imzadi1979→07:39, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't understand, first if want to make test edits then u could have done for say 1 or 2 article not 18 articles, If you were doing test edits then why you nominated template for deletion? or you doing other way like removing all link and then nominate of deletion on name of test edits?, Anyways I would really suggest that no good I idea to use normal template for expressway article, if expressway template violates any rule, then I need to fixed and make it as per polices, not delete/removed from wikipedia. As I said earlier If you still feels this template is duplicate/not necessary/useless etc etc. please start discussion/nominate for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 July 2. Whatever the result would be we will comply to that. KuwarOnlineTalk09:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Basically the issue is that rollback is for reverting vandalism only. 18 edits is a *lot* and that is why I brought it up to ANI, as it indicates a misunderstanding of the rollback policy. However, as long as you only use rollback for reverting vandalism it shouldn't be a problem again. (Wikipedia:Rollback feature) --Rschen775405:43, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The user User talk:Imzadi1979 changed template to all pages of expressway, which I reverted and the discussion is underway, till time I reverted his all edits regarding changed in template. Once the discussion ends, whatever will be the result, will change according. I used rollback function because it was more, if it would have 1 or 2, I would have used normal undo. Certainly not misused. KuwarOnlineTalk05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please remove my rollback right, Certainly in future I will only use rollback to revert mass edits, so it better, I should not have it. thanks KuwarOnlineTalk05:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Since you have asked for the rollback bit to be removed, and that it has been done, you should remove the topicon from your user and talk pages. Codf1977 (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability. References given are press releases, internal or references to the parent company. Google search does not pick up anything to establish notability.
I have nominated Nelito Systems, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelito Systems. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Nellogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi...Although I appreciate your warning, I by no means, am indulging in 'disruptive' editing of the IGI page. The article suggests the Delhi is the second busiest airport in India after Mumbai in terms of passengers... Not only is it wrong but the fact that you dont read news papers makes it weirder that you are accusing me of making disruptive changes. Delhi is busiest in terms of passengers and aircraft movement Delhi has last year handled 26.2M passengers per annum compared to BOMs 25.8. So please check your sources back...I guess ill make an account again(My last account being hacked)and then make changes and back it up with a reference but I guess you as a prime contributor to WIKI India sections should take into consideration the changes before shooting emails.I am not vandalizing the thread I assure you. Period
Hi there, As you removed the complete sentence without reading the sources added to prove that claim, if you have any better/quality sources that says that delhi is most busiest in term of passenger traffic add it to article and remove the claim I made, As you said "So please check your sources back", I will advice you to check the source I have added to it. It says "For the financial year 2008-09, while the Mumbai airport recorded 23.6 million passenger footfalls, the Delhi airport recorded 22.84 million". There are lots admin/sr editors watching this(IGI) article, Still no body removed the sentence you removed. simply because, Whatever I have added is backed by quality reference. So removing claims backed with quality source is called Vandalism. Reason is, its deliberate act. KuwarOnlineTalk04:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so very much for your help in brushing up and improving the reference pages/links in my first article on the Weymouth band, The Dolmen. There is quite a bit to learn regarding proper posting of articles within Wikipedia, and I am so grateful for pointers and assitance as I make my through the labyrinth.
Regards,
Ceitidh (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, KuwarOnline. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi, I want to know how to fix citation in cite book. i find it difficult to do it. Please check this for citations 23 and 24. tell how to used single citation more than once. --Onef9day Talk!13:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
hmm there is very simple way to do it. just visit following link citfixes and add your article name there. click run reflink wait for while till toolserver do the job for you after some time go to end of the page and follow. KuwarOnlineTalk14:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
