User talk:KurdianA

December 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abu Hanifa Dinawari have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abu Hanifa Dinawari was changed by KurdianA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872344 on 2023-12-12T12:31:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hanifa Dinawari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Peshmerga, you may be blocked from editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 09:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know why it’s unsourced? It’s literally on ckb Wikipedia KurdianA (talk) 10:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTSOURCE Shadow4dark (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peshmerga. Shadow4dark (talk) 14:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What vandalize it’s literally written that peshmerga was founded in 1946, 2023-1946 is 77! KurdianA (talk) 15:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peshmerga&diff=prev&oldid=1190031996 Shadow4dark (talk) 15:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s written 1920/1946 do the subtraction and it gives the same number KurdianA (talk) 15:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove the warning it literally doesn’t make sense KurdianA (talk) 17:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mil Mi-17, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Kurdish indepentence factions may operate the Mi-17, but there is no Kurdish state as of yet. ZLEA _T\^C 15:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isnt it a reliable resource? KurdianA (talk) 15:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are misrepresenting a reliable source. Kurdish independence factions are not a Kurdish state, so saying that Kurdistan operates the Mi-17 is highly inaccurate. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean Kurdish Kurdish independence factions? The peshmerga uses it which is the official army of Kurdistan region KurdianA (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's still not a Kurdish state, so my point still stands. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but I can state it as ‘’Kurdistan Region’’ or ‘’Iraqi Kurdistan’’ KurdianA (talk) 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would be more acceptable. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

so now I can re-add it in MI-17 right? KurdianA (talk) 15:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to it, though non-state operators are not usually included in the main article due to the large number of state operators. It might be better to include it in List of Mil Mi-8/17 operators. - ZLEA _T\^C 15:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

👍 KurdianA (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #82438 is closed

Thank you for using the Unblock Ticket Request System. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. This requires greater discussion than is possible via UTRS. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want my advice, this is probably too contentious a subject area for new users. You might want to gain experience editing about non contentious topics first. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know what’s non contentious KurdianA (talk) 09:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

???? KurdianA (talk) 12:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've asked and I blocked you and made you aware that, as per the Arbitration Committee, "Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed" are the contentious topic here, I would clarify that non-contentious topics are not affirmatively defined as such; they are what isn't currently considered contentious.

I notice that your edits since the block expired have moved mostly from articles about topics indisputably within the contentious aspect of ARBKURD to articles about military weapons, a topic not inherently contentious ... but your edits have focused on their use by Kurdish peshmerga, which has made them contentious. If you continue in this vein, we will not only have to block you again and for longer, it will be one you can appeal only to the Arbitration Committee.

As you are a new user and you do seem to want to do right by the project, I am making a good-faith effort to help you. What I would suggest is that, if you're interested in Kurdish topics, you move away for now from editing articles about the conflicts or closely related to them to articles about things like Kurdish culture—popular songs or the artists who perform them, works of literature and writers, things like that ... things less likely to make people revert your edits as long as they are properly and reliably sourced.

You might very much want to add yourself to WikiProject Kurdistan as a participant and seek out the assistance of editors there, who are very likely much better versed in Kurdish culture than I am and probably willing to help a newer such editor develop rather than get blocked indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I misunderstood in Wikipedia rules and made some mistakes in editing and I will try not redoing the mistakes and improve my edits KurdianA (talk) 09:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Zeravani

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zeravani, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using reliable sources

Several of the comments to your talk page have dealt with using reliable sources. Some of the content you have added has been from websites that function as mirrors of Wikipedia. These are generally recognizable by the appearance of Wikipedia-like textual formatting, bracketed citations inline, and bracketed statements like "citation needed". These sorts of websites are prohibited for use as references per WP:CIRCULAR. I have made the relevant reversions.

Additionally, I must add that I agree with other editors: you probably should avoid contentious topics like Kurdistan (which you seem to hold a connection with) until you have more editing experience. If you want to practice editing without a hundred other editors judging your every move, a few good places to start are articles on plants, non-endangered animals, or geology. There are usually highly reliable sources available on these topics and their articles are usually severely underdeveloped. Once you have maybe a month or two of regular editing under your belt, a return to Kurdish topics would be more welcome. However, this is merely advice, so ignoring it carries no direct consequences. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Combatuser1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Combatuser1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 10:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]