User talk:Kuraimizu

Welcome!

Hello, Kuraimizu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please discuss any page moves first on the article's talk page. Thanks.—Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 15:13, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Property (philosophy). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 16:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And stop edit warring, you have been reverted on this so you now discuss. ----Snowded ^TALK 17:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes weren't an improvement. Regarding your edit of the article Quantity, an article needs to read like contiguous text. At the moment, it reads: "Quantity is a property that can exist as a magnitude or multitude"; regardless of whether or not the article property (philosophy) is moved, the text will need to be preserved - changing it to "Quantity is a property (Scientific, Mathematical) that can exist as a magnitude or multitude" is not helpful. As for the title, if you have a better title than Property (philosophy) (note: Property (logic) redirects to it; I have also created a redirect from Property (mathematics)), please discuss it on the talk page. Since the article covers both philosophy, logic, and mathematics, neither title is better than the other. (Property (ambiguous) is thoroughly uninformative - see the naming conventions.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:08, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]