User talk:Kunalmasson

Welcome!

Hi Kunalmasson! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Thakur Parivar (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no inline citations and not enough context for me to establish the subject of the article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shri Thakur Parivar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 02:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kunalmasson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 02:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Dharm Paul (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shri Dharm Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shri Thakur Ji Maharaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shri Thakur Ji Maharaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shri Dharm Paul

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shri Dharm Paul, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 12:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shri Thakur Parivar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shri Thakur Parivar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 12:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User Bbb23,

I hope this email finds you well. My name is Kunal Masson, and I am writing to appeal the IP block that has been placed on my account by you. I recently encountered an issue where my IP address was blocked due to false allegations of spamming. I believe this block was unjustified, and I would like to request its removal.

Here are the details of my situation:

1. **Draft Creation:**

- I recently created a draft titled "Shri Dharm Paul," which is about a spiritual leader. This draft was a result of three months of hard work, and I intended to contribute positively to Wikipedia by sharing information about this notable individual.

- Before submitting the draft for review, I sought help from other users as I am relatively new to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, my draft was in speedly deleted by another user who accused me of promoting content/products . As I Have a whole internet to promote my spiritual leader why I should promote here. I just want to upload a Article on my Spiritual Master for knowledge.

2. **False Allegations:**

- I assure you that I have not violated any Wikipedia policies. My intention was solely to contribute accurate and relevant information.

- I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and ensuring that my contributions align with the community's standards.

3. **Appeal Request:**

- I kindly request that my IP address be unblocked so that I can continue contributing constructively.

- Additionally, I would appreciate a review of my draft, "Shri Dharm Paul," to determine if it meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

I am passionate about spreading knowledge and promoting notable figures, and I believe that my contributions can add value to Wikipedia. I sincerely hope that you will consider my appeal and provide guidance on how I can rectify this situation.

Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to your response.

Best regards,

Kunal Masson

Username- @kunalmasson Kunalmasson (talk) 07:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 In case you're wondering, this reply that the user is sending had a probability of 100% AI generation. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 07:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NoobThreePointOh And how do you know that it is AI-generated? Indians are often more fluent in English than American's and Britisher's. If you search, you’ll find that Indians speak English at a higher percentage than American's and Britisher's do. Just because you don’t know English doesn’t mean that no one else does. I runs a charitable trust, I communicate with many Indian organizations in English every day.

Thank you. Kunalmasson (talk) 08:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked on GPTZero. And yes, I am very fluent in English. I could already tell it was AI-generated by the "Dear" and the "Best regards". Plus, GPTZero said, "We are highly confident this text was AI-generated with 100% probability." I'm not going to keep replying here anymore. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used to write Dear and Best regards in every single mail. as I tell you I runs a Charitable Trust Respecting elder is a culture of India. and I loudly say that English have not much words to respectful Persons like "Hindi". and It is like my way of talking to a person. Many Indian used to write Dear and Best Regards, just asked from your GPTZero. I just want to solve my problem I doesn't want to talk about who wrote this for me. If you will not able to help me, Please don't create a Scene here. If you Have a solution for my problem then Please reply. I'm new to wikipedia I don't know to block and report user. but I know to how to write a Mail to wikimedia support team. If I do a mistake to writing the article, I accept this. but speedly deleting my article is not a perfect solution. I am fully prepared to improve my article but I also want a support who tell me that Your article doesn't violate any guidelines. But this will not be resolved my problem by blocking me. Kunalmasson (talk) 08:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NoobThreePointOh If this was AI-generated, How AI write this - " As I Have a whole internet to promote my spiritual leader why I should promote here. I just want to upload a Article on my Spiritual Master for knowledge." AI picks information from Internet. and that's why I'm creating this Page for knowledge and Information. It is baseless talk. Kunalmasson (talk) 08:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kunalmasson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir/Mam,

My name is Kunal Masson, I run a Charitable Trust named Sunshine Charity Trust (Regd.) in India. It was established in 1981 by Shri Dharm Paul who was a guru and Journalist too. from that our Trust is also connected with many famous saints/gurus of India like Dada Vaswani, swami Rangnathanand, swami samarananand, Shri Ramakrishna Mission, anandashram, swami Sawrupanand, Mother Teresa, Dalai Lama, swami parmukh & Many Organisations of India, the list is even long . And from the beginning, our Guru's fame was a little less but as I mentioned many saints and organisation know him directly. He was always seen as a journalist (proof is linked with above word " Journalist") on the internet. That's why we want to publish an article about him on Wikipedia. So that people can get information about him. Therefore, my appeal is that I am not writing an article to promote any organisation/ person on Wikipedia, I just want to write this article to provide information and knowledge. If I made any mistake while writing the old articles, then I accept that mistake and assure you that I have no intention of violating any guidelines of Wikipedia. I do not want that Wikipedia guidelines are violated due to my mistake. I request you to give me one more chance so that I can correct my mistake and spread more knowledge among people through my article. I request you to remove the blocking from my editing so that I can again publish that article after getting more information about Shri Dharm Paul and being neutral about him.

Thank you very much for your support.

Your Sincerely, Kunalmasson (talk) 09:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The proper place for you to tell the world about the founder of your organization is its own website and social media, not Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a place to summarize what independent reliable sources say about a person, not what those with a conflict of interest want to say about them. If you are compensated in any way for your role as the operator of this charitable trust, the Terms of Use require you to declare as a paid editor. You won't be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about this person or your organization. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you want to edit about other topics for which you have no conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.