Jump to content

User talk:Kumquat Fields

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1 (Aug. 2007-Jan. 2008)

[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Harvest Fresh Market, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Realkyhick 22:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kumquat Fields (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why was the reason I was blocked? All it says on my indef block page is: ...! please decline.

Decline reason:

... generally means yet another sockpuppet of a serial abuser of multiple accounts, which is the case here. — jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 14:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It was probably a checkuser-based block, given Jpgordon (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)'s role in this regard. That being said, I have no further clues than you. I'm following this up with those who may be able to provide further information as we speak. Cheers, Daniel 11:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kumquat Fields (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Decline reason:

Uh, then you'll be just a renamed and blocked abuser of multiple accounts. — jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kumquat Fields (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Decline reason:

You are done here. — Yamla 23:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Ublock

[edit]

Template:Ublock has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 01:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]