User talk:Kumarvivek0811

Hello, Kumarvivek0811, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 20:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Recstacy.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

further explanation

As reviewing administrator, I think you need a further explanation. The sources you have been adding do not indicate notability , for they are not references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources. You would need multiple articles from reliable independent newspapers or the like. For festivals such as this, they are almost never available--everything that appears will either be a mere notice of the event or a press release. Unless you really have such sources, it's unlikely there can ever be an article. DGG ( talk ) 03:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide newspaper / book refs for your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Recstacy.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CathMontgomery (talk) 20:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems reasonable - do not be discouraged by a decline, but please provide actual references, I'm sure there are some press articles, as your subject seems notable. Read this >> WP:CITE << and resubmit, good luck! From, CathMontgomery (talk) 20:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war over image size

The logo File:Recstacy Logo.png, as a non-free image, must comply with WP:NFC(please read) minimalization restrictions on non-free images, including size. This bold, low-detail logo contains nothing to justify exceeding 320x320 (>90K pixels). If any text were to become unreadable, the usual practice is to replicate it in the description parameter of the rationale template. For more information, please read WP:EDITWAR. --Lexein (talk) 10:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Recstacy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Recstacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recstacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lexein (talk) 00:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Kumarvivek0811. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further Explanation

Hi Smartse, I wasn't aware about the conflict of interest (COI). This page is for a notable website and is not advertising.

It satisfies Wikipedia's guidelines:

The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself
This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations.
The website or content has won a well-known, reputable, and independent award, either from a publication or organisation

Wikipedia guidelines for an article to be included in the encyclopedia:

To be worth including in the encyclopedia a subject must be sufficiently notable and that notability must be verifiable through references to reliable sources.
These sources should be reliable (some examples include (but are not limited to): books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals)

I have already tried to publish the articles without any bias as per Wikipedia guidelines. This wasn't a paid job and there was no compensation involved for this. There are other similar pages available on wikipedia. All the information is verifiable and is from good sources (i.e. have a reputation for reliability). I am not sure about other things I am required to do to resolve this COI. Please suggest the things I should be doing to make sure this issue is resolved. Thanks.

Kumarvivek0811 (talk) 10:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NIT Durgapur Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NIT Durgapur Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meesho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meesho, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meesho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]