User talk:KumareshPassoupathi

November 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Anti-Brahminism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Sun eye 1 (talk) 10:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is fair to add calls to violences that happened inspired by the topic. Could you help me understand how to write the same without the influence of POV and commentory? Thanks.

Thanks for letting me know! Updated the article without opinion facet! Could you please take a look and let me know if I've got it right? @Sun eye 1 (talk) Thanks! KP (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--DBig Xrayᗙ 17:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jaggi Vasudev, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. ∯WBG^converse 08:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: Thanks for reaching out! With all due respect, proper comments were given out for the reversal of the article. Most of the pieces and references made by you seems to be with a potential bias. It would seem that ∯WBG has been indulging in WP:NPOV violations in editing the page Jaggi Vasudev and in contributing actively to disruptive editing by merging down the page Isha_Foundation. You're being requested to refrain from such frivolous activities. Continuous unreasonable onslaught will result in escalations to the arbitration council. Thank you! KP (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cool story, bro and nice English. I wish you luck. ∯WBG^converse 20:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jaggi Vasudev and Isha Yoga Foundation

Please respond and clarify your relationship with Jaggi Vasudev and Isha Yoga Foundation. You have to disclose them--DBig Xrayᗙ 22:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DBig! Thanks for getting back! I'd like to state that I'm neither gainfully employed nor am I a residential volunteer at the Isha Foundation. I've got no legal relationship with Jaggi Vasudev. I'm happily employed in Bangalore in a Data Science firm. About disclosure, I'm a patron of a children's rural education non-profit run by the Foundation called Isha Vidhya. As per Wikipedia norms, I've disclosed the same while writing a draft for the Isha Vidhya page ( which incidentally got taken down as a mass nuking, that doesn't quite seem unbiased). Following due norms, the draft will be subjected to review before publication.

Now that I've disclosed the absence of bias in my editing, might I request you, along with WBG, to be kind enough to disclose or state that you might not be swayed/influenced by your respective personal, political opinions in the seemingly biased treatment of articles related to the Foundation and even something that panders to Rural Children's Education? Thanks :)

KP (talk) 22:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I take that any individual is bound to have political biases (in that apolitical is sharply political) and I don't claim any immunity, either; if you suspect violations of WP:NPOV, you might approach WP:NPOVN and/or escalate along the dispute-resolution-ladder. ∯WBG^converse 08:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Clarification on CoI. Thank you. ∯WBG^converse 08:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ∯WBG! Thanks for taking the time out to let me know! Hope you have a great day! :) KP (talk) 10:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Jaggi_Vasudev. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing.

If you ignore this warning, and continue the personal attacks, you will find yourself blocked very very soon. DBig Xrayᗙ 09:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'Personal Attacks' seems quite an exaggeration. I've merely pointed out, politely, and in an objective tone, what I feel seems to be bias, for external admins to evaluate. If any, your threat to block 'very very' soon, sounds like a harassment. Now that I know about raising bias issues of users in a dispute resolution page, instead of the page being edited, I'll follow that. Please do not frame a honest mistake in following procedures as an 'attack'. Hope your day's awesome :) Thanks! :) KP (talk) 11:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:No personal attacks explains this very clearly that what you are doing IS "personal attack". read WP:CIVIL and understand the tone that is expected from you. Admins do not monitor these talk pages, so If you are intending to address the admins, you should better do it at wP:ANI. Behavior issues if any must be taken up at ANI and not at talk pages. As for my warning message above. You can call the warning, whatever you feel like. Wikipedia community expects that the user is "warned" before being escalated for a block. And this warning will also pre-empt the situation where you could feign ignorance about WP:NPA, due to lack of any formal warning, if you are blocked. So I hope you follow the message and do what is expected of you. --DBig Xrayᗙ 12:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, alright, calm down, User:DBigXray ! :) I'm genuinely new to this. And, I meant no malice! Sorry if I'd hurt your feelings, or that of User:Winged_Blades_of_Godric (damn! That user name gets more difficult to type, every time! :P) I'll try more to understand guidelines and abide by them here on! Thanks again, for taking the time out to sit me through this. I think, I'll take a break from these pages and focus on improving the pages in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pondicherry that I've been eyeing for a while now. :) KP (talk) 07:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Isha Vidhya concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Isha Vidhya, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Isha Vidhya

Hello, KumareshPassoupathi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Isha Vidhya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]