User talk:Kulveer

Welcome!

Hello, Kulveer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Vsmith 13:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks.

Hi - I have moved your content from List of stone to a new article Stones of India. Also removed additions from marble, sandstone and granite, as they seemed to be promotional rather than informative - see spam note above. Vsmith 13:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect notice

You keep deleting this notice. Is there any reason to do so? --BorgQueen (talk) 05:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, according to Wikipedia:Layout, disambiguation links need to be at the top of the article. Having them in the middle or at the end will confuse readers because they will have to read all the way down to find that it is not what they intended to read. --BorgQueen (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your comment on my talk page

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia, I've great respect for Sikhs, and that's the reason I've created this article. When people search for "Sardarji jokes" on Google, they thousands of nonsense jokes (often in poor taste). I wanted to create an article that would help people know about the jokes' origins, and how Sikh community feels about it.

The "Sikh perspective" is not being removed here -- the "original research" perspective is being removed here. Wikipedia is not about sourcing content only from "celebrities", but any source that classifies as reliable (e.g. books, newspapers, journals, notable blogs etc.). The blog published on o3.indiatimes.com is not notable -- it's not a reliable source.

Wikipedia needs to a policy regarding the reliability of sources, otherwise, it will turn into a junkyard of opinion pieces - another person could write a blog about how Sardarji jokes are very good, and might insist that his blog be included as a reference in the article.

Please see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. utcursch | talk 03:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I removed the 12'o clock section, since it was tagged as unreferenced -- I failed to notice the Indian Express link and thought it is sourced from the blog as well -- my mistake. As for the blog, like I said, if we allow all kinds of sources, Wikipedia will turn into a junkyard. I'm sure somebody must have published a reply to Vir Sanghvi's editorial in a reliable source -- let's try to find such a piece, and add it to the article. utcursch | talk 11:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Granite

Hi, I reverted your edit, since the report is hosted on the trade organization's website. This is hardly a reliable source. If you have a peer-reviewed study, then that has some potential, but the likelihood that this one is unreliable is too great.--Terrillja _talk 06:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if a talk page comment has reasonable content, then leave it, no reason to remove just because it's one sided. Obviously people present their side of the story, because everyone comes from their own perspective. --Terrillja _talk 06:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Granite, you will be blocked for vandalism. Do not remove other people's comments. Talk pages are intended for people to express their views. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked. Terrillja _talk 16:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Singh

Thank you for your message. I don't have a problem if someone has additional information, but I just checked it up in the Sen article. Thus I removed it. Your other reference to Sinha, I left alone since it seems like it could be and also there was a reference to it in another article.

Cheers

Gorkhali (talk) 03:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, thats the right way to go on Wikipedia. Cross-checking all facts and conjectures is essential. Take care Kulveer (talk) 07:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sinhalese

Please do not remove again. The word "Sinha" is derived from the same source as the Punjabi word "Singh", namely Sanskrit. Both are Indo-Aryan languages. --Maurice45 (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fine --Maurice45 (talk) 11:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Dear, I am on your side i.e I presume the side of objective presentation of topics relevant to a subject. I have added lots of relevant material to this page. Removal of irrelevant material cannot be deemed as 'censorship'. You are most welcome to make a page on 'Bihari joke', where you can present the subjective statements of an individual. Take Care; and please note this; I appreciate your extensive work on Wikipedia. A single removal of a line deemed irrelevant to the topic may be taken in the right spirit, without any personal motive. Thanks.Kulveer (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sikh-History for removing the warnings. Really Appreciate. Kulveer (talk) 04:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kulveer. You have new messages at Sitush's talk page.
Message added 09:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sitush (talk) 09:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Samra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Samara page

You seem to have been around a long time and should not edit war something that would lead you to be blocked or banned, not a threat or a warning just a friendly suggestiion. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have never included anything without a citation on Wikipedia. I think Sitush is bullying in his deletions of anything related to an author called James Tod. And then he is feigning ignorance of the fact that Samra and Sumra are different spellings of the same HIndi surname, something akin to Dutta/Datta, Agarwal/Agrawal, Misra/Mishra. He has ruthlessly vandalised the entire page and made it a stub after all the hard work that has gone into finding reliable well known sources of information on it. I am not a Wikipedia Pro, I seek your help in resolving this issue. If there is a dispute resolution mechanism on Wikipedia, I am willing to take my case there.Kulveer (talk) 08:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tod is history, I cant discuss history, under a topic ban. Regarding Samra=Sumra you need a reliable source for that. You could try wp:RSN, just don't attack editors, that also could get you blocked or banned. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 16:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Samra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chunar Fort and Jind Kaur

Please include sources for your recent addition to Chunar Fort. There appear to be some references on Jind Kaur's wiki which you can perhaps reuse. Thanks. --Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 10:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priya Singh Paul (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Potential WP:BLP violation - too much emphasis is placed on a tabloid rumour and not enough on her independent career.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priya Singh Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 18:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kulveer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 18:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Priya Singh Paul has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priya Singh Paul. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priya Singh Paul (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TryKid was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Many issues. Many sections read like advertisiment for her and the tabloid rumour issue too.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priya Singh Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Priya Singh Paul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TryKid (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kulveer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Priya Singh Paul

Hello, Kulveer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Priya Singh Paul.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Priya Singh Paul

Hello, Kulveer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Priya Singh Paul".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HawkAussie (talk) 23:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]