User talk:Kulunnn

Kulunnn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kulunnn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, I'm Tommi1986. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chen Duxiu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 19:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is clear. I will add sources in the future.--Kulunnn (talk) 19:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Helen Foster Snow—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Legende Legende Legende, if you're going to change the GDP value in the People's Liberation Army article (like [1]) you need to provide a source that supports that new value. Really, you've been trying to sneak in that sort of change on that article for over half a year, and longer for other articles. Familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Verifiability.

Saying that, also look at Wikipedia:Plagiarism as well, since that's another long running problem for you (case in point: Mao Yichang edits on 2 October.) - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 02:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and another long running issue is using Wikipedia as a source (like for your summaries for Type 052D destroyer edits); Wikipedia - any language - is not a reliable source. See the WP:USERG section of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 02:43, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will have a look at those sources.--Kulunnn (talk) 05:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Legende Legende Legende, it's really time for you to stop removing non-English terms and specific references to US dollars. None of that is actually useful. In particular, the "$" symbol is ambiguous; more than one currency uses it.

Furthermore, it's also time to stop editing things that you clearly do not understand what's going on. For example, this edit, which makes things worse. Evidently whoever last edited those numbers tried - not quite successfully - to use a new reference (the [11]), a reference that does indeed specify USD. A helpful edit would have been to fix the reference syntax. Instead, in your usual manner, you only manage to inappropriately attribute newer data to older sources. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 07:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review.--Kulunnn (talk) 18:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Legende Legende Legende per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legende Legende Legende. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TheresNoTime ^{(to chat)} 20:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]