User talk:Kukini/Archive6
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kukini. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I like the welcome message, and I know you've been trying to add the signature to it automatically. Best I can tell, you cannot do it unless you do something like {{User:Kukini/Welcome|~~~~}}, which seems acceptable. I'll look into how to do this if you'd like. You'll probably want to leave off the sig if none was passed. Ash Lux 15:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I got that working for you. The sig will simply not be there if you leave it off. Ash Lux 16:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Note: it was working with the signature this morning and then it stopped. I am not sure who broke what but I'd recommend reverting to the last edit(s).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm. It seems to be working just fine for me. The usage on the page was wrong, I kind of forgot the User namespace. If you copy and pasted the usage on the template page, that could have been the problem. You should use {{subst:User:Kukini/Welcome|~~~~}} instead of {{subst:Kukini/Welcome|~~~~}}. If that wasn't it, then it could have been the MediaWiki extension m:ParserFunctions was messed up briefly. What was the problem you encountered? Ash Lux 16:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- It would be working if Kukini would stop reverting you :p Kukini, as far as I tell Ash version is more generic and works.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- If you want, you can use {{User:Ashlux/Welcome}}. You will not need to pass a sig parameter with this one. -- Ash Lux (talk | contribs) 22:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- It would be working if Kukini would stop reverting you :p Kukini, as far as I tell Ash version is more generic and works.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm. It seems to be working just fine for me. The usage on the page was wrong, I kind of forgot the User namespace. If you copy and pasted the usage on the template page, that could have been the problem. You should use {{subst:User:Kukini/Welcome|~~~~}} instead of {{subst:Kukini/Welcome|~~~~}}. If that wasn't it, then it could have been the MediaWiki extension m:ParserFunctions was messed up briefly. What was the problem you encountered? Ash Lux 16:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Note: it was working with the signature this morning and then it stopped. I am not sure who broke what but I'd recommend reverting to the last edit(s).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
:) You deserve the yellow thingy for the design, too :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
DYK for Land Run of 1889
I posted 3 variations for did you know for the Land Run of 1889 article. Take a look at the suggestions on the DYK talk page. Let me know what you think (and feel free to fix them). Thanks =) Ash Lux 15:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Your user talk page problem
Your talk page seems to have a problem with the edit link lining up with the section that it is editing. I'm not sure why, but I figured I would give you a fyi. Ash Lux 15:49, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Re message
To late, there is already a Hangon on it. Try the prod route now. --Dakota ~ 16:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Email.--Dakota ~ 16:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Resent, btw the section editing is not working right.--Dakota ~ 16:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Revert vandal
Not a problem, Kukini, not a problem at all. All the best, --HubHikari 22:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello
Dakota ~ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
- Don't know why they would do that. Think I will float on over there.--Dakota ~ 01:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Tone's RfA thanks
Problem fixed
Hey Kukini, 'course I remember you! :D I just used <div> to replace the <h3> tags around "Current discussion", which were creating an extra "edit" section (so that was my fault, probably). Hope this solves it. Cheers, Sango123 (e) 04:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely! We'd better watch out though; Natalya's RfA is going to turn into a pile-on before long. :) Sango123 (e) 04:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, to begin, she's a friendly, well-respected, and helpful contributor with great answers to the RfA questions. Sorry for the short reply; it's 1:03 a.m. here, and I'm off to bed. :) Cheers, Sango123 (e) 05:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
WP:AIV
No problem. Usually when I try to block people on there, by the time I've looked at their edits and their talk page, someone else has already blocked them :) I guess this time was an exception. Thanks for reporting. Mak (talk) 05:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank you for reverting the vandalism at my user page! -- Kim van der Linde at venus 05:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- I was planning on that. Just did a complete rewrite of a page (after someone dumped pretty much everything as plain text on it earlier today). -- Kim van der Linde at venus 05:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think this one might go as an indef block as an vandalism/attack only account. Yes, he would have had 24 hours with me at this moment. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 05:42, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
WikiLove!
| File:Atlanticpuffin4.jpg | Hello Kukini. Thank you for your support at request for adminship which ended at the overwhelming and flattering result of (160/1/0), and leaves me in a position of having to live up to a high standard of community expectation. If you need any admin assistance, feel free to ask me, and naturally, if I make any procedural mistakes, feel free to point them out and I look forward to working with you in the future, especially on BSB. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC) |
Edit help
Hi Kukini, I really need some help in composing an edit summary, since this is not the first time I fail in doing that... Any suggestions?
Why did you?
Okay why was the text from Kayte Christensen removed. I can understand you wanting to keep the article clean but come on, you never eevn stated a reason why you removed it. There was enough evidance to back this up[1].
From the user known only as 81.157.255.157
- Response is on your user talk page. Kukini 18:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
You got mail
In your inbox.--Dakota ~ 17:59, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
What do I do with this?
I came across this page Downtown business magnet high school and don't know what to do with it...I figure it needs to be deleted, but I don't know how and if there's some policy I have to go through to have it done. I googled the school name, and it didn't even come up with an official site, so I doubt its worth fixing into a decent article. If you could let me know how to deal with this, or do it yourself, I'd much appreciate it. Thanks! Carl.bunderson 21:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you Carl.bunderson 21:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
are you in
Are you online? Let me know.--Dakota ~ 01:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Working on it, stumped at the moment?--Dakota ~ 02:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Check your mail--Dakota ~ 02:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Looks good.--Dakota ~ 03:19, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thanks.
Thank you for the welcome message. Did I perhaps make a mistake or are you just being friendly? Also, did you happen to see my user page front? - Dr. Zaret 02:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay! Thanks a lot! I appreciate it very much. Also, give a quick look at my userpage. - Dr. Zaret 04:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Wow
Ran into your welcome template on a new user's page. It has lots of great information, but doesn't feel cluttered. Great job. I may start using it. D-Rock (Yell at D-Rock) 04:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello
{{Smile}}
Bhadani has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!
--Bhadani 14:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Hola
¡Tu eres feo! Ricardo Lagos 00:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
A haiku of thanks
- Thanks for your support
- In my RfA, which passed!
- Wise I'll try to be.
I really appreciate your positive support! Thanks again, and good luck with your own RfA, which appears to be proceeding nicely!
-- Natalya 04:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Thank you for the trust that you had in me when you supported my Request for Adminship. The nomination ended successfully and I am actually overwhelmed by the support that I received. Thanks again! -- Kim van der Linde at venus 06:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Puppy
Re: Vandalism Quandry
Bloody AOL... ;) Seriously, there's not much you can do except hand out a 15-minute block to stop persistent vandalism from an AOL IP. The only exception is an AOL proxy, and I've hit a couple of those, blocking each for 24h. Have fun! ;) RadioKirk talk to me 04:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you, you're very kind :) RadioKirk talk to me 04:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
AIV
No problems, just helping out when I can. I was originally going to remove the last one for not vandalising after the test4, but then I saw that you had already warned the IP with a test3 and this IP has been blocked before. And thank you for your part in reporting to AIV. ;-) --Deathphoenix ʕ 15:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Your welcome
Trying some newpage patroling--Rayc 23:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
for the "Welcomer's Barnstar"! I see you do a lot of welcoming also. If you don't mind a bit of technical advice:
The {{PAGENAME}} variable, which you are using, can produce unwanted results. First, the welcomed user will see the {{PAGENAME}} code if he clicks "edit." And second, if the welcome is archived, the {{PAGENAME}} variable won't make sense, since it will change to reflect the name of the archived page.
For these reasons, you may wish to consider subst:ing the PAGENAME, by writing {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>PAGENAME}} instead of {{PAGENAME}}. The template will then run the SUBST: when you substitute the template (caution: this only works for subst:ed templates), producing a static PAGENAME variable. See {{subst:User:Iamthejabberwock/Welcome}} or {{subst:User:ABCD/welcome}} for examples.
Also, a question: where do you get your edit summary request ([2])? Is it a template or copy-and-paste code? I like it better than {{Editsummary}} or {{Summary}}.
If you want to make the change to your welcome but are confused by this complicated explanation I'd be happy to do it. Thanks again! Λυδαcιτγ(TheJabberwock) 23:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
about Steve Scalise
Hey, thanks, but I don't know when I'll get around to it. In fact, I've never heard of him before, but maybe it's time to figure out something about him. The best part of editing WP, for me at least, is that it forces me to learn some things I'd never find out about. Also, I'm noticing from your comment that I've not updated my user page in quite a while, as Lousiana politicians were of interest to me about 10,000 edits ago! :) Although I'm sure I'll be back on them again, I tend to change interests on WP all the time. But maybe I should change my user page to reflect on some current interests? ;P Best, --Deville (Talk) 02:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
My reverts
On the bballer, I inquired from Agc7528, an experienced and proven good-faith user, as to all ten of his blankings in one go [3]. On Meir Kahane, user erroneously duplicated identical info about the murder of his son on articles for both the father and the son, Binyamin Ze'ev Kahane. I reverted the father, but didn't deem it necessary to notify,b/c not vandalism, and the info was retained in any event. I always warn. Thanks for paying close attention, though, and for the compliment. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar Brigade
Hi Kukini. Can you look that User:Attilios and User:Snottygobble please. I think they deserve a lot more, but it seems a bit corrupt/nepotistic to give two to the same person. Thanks, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC).
- I've linked to WP:BSB from the Programs page if that's what you meant. The other programs are not directly on the main page, so I didn't disrupt the flow.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Mahalo Nui!
Aloha & thanks for the message! Itʻs great to hear from people (especially people from Laʻie who know what theyʻre doing, as Iʻm still fumblinʻ around...makes me feel like I have hope!) & get the tech advice I desperately need. You should come home soon, itʻs beautiful right now. After our 6 wks of straight rain, the oceanʻs finally clean again & the mountain apples are ripe! Aloha, Laualoha 08:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Wanted you to know...
...in case you don't watch my talkpage that your message meant a lot to me. Its nice to be reminded that I do have positive interactions with people when most of the stuff I deal with day to day is vandals. You were also one of the earliest conversations of my adminship; I had only passed my rfa maybe 13 days before. =D Syrthiss 12:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Re:I just read
Too much stress. Constant migraine. :) Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 19:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
My RFA
¡Hola!
name change
Thank you for your message of welcome on my user page. When I registered I did so as Adambrink. I would like to change it to reflect my name properly: Adam Brink. Can this be done? --Adambrink 04:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. I'll leave it be: no point in being vain. On a broader point, I have printed out and yesterday read with some care the various guides to style and etiquette that I could find. 'Boldness tempered with civility' seems to be the key. I'll keep your contact details and contact you should I have any questions. Enjoy your day! Adam Brink aka --Adambrink 05:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- FYI, Kukini, this can be done by bureaucrats and the user's contributions do carry over. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 04:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Someone else already notified him. I saw his response when I came to thank you and went to make sure he got the right info. I just wanted you to know since you are active with new users and the question might come up again. Thanks for your welcoming work.
—WAvegetarian•(talk) 05:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you
I appreciate the recognition although I wouldn't call V. Joe a meanie or anyone else a crummy editor. Do I have your permission to change the text to "for countless efforts to defend Wikipedia from miscategorization at new page patrol."? —WAvegetarian•(talk) 04:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- I know that you would never try to disparage anyone and did get a good laugh out of it. I just wanted to have it cleaned up before I put it on my user page. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 04:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Seeking Help and Guidance
Dear Kukini,
I need to know (a) if it is possible to do something; and (b) if it is, in fact, possible, how I might go about coding in oorder to allow it to happen.
I am presently engaged in completing a rather long task connected with the topic of "placebo".
At this stage, I have submitted Placebo (origins of technical term) and have discovered that -- no doubt due to the amount of coding generated by the cross-referncing, etc. (because the word count is only something like 4,000 words) -- I am being given warnings that the article is too long and that I should think about its length.
In order to reduce its length, I have taken out an entire section, and placed it in the Wiki as a new and separate section entitled Uses of the term placebo. (I had a far more complex title, but some kind helper changed it into this far better title.)
This was done essentially for 4 reasons: (a) if you knew about those usages, you would be bored reading about them, (b) once you have read them, you would not need to read them again, (c) each point needs to be made at some length in order for somebody who is not initially aware of the terminological mess to understand what is going on, and (d) it also allows room for other examples to be added.
So much for the preamble; now to my question.
(1) Towards the end of the article Placebo (origins of technical term) I decided that I wanted to refer readers to a specific section of the Nocebo article that already contains a discussion that equally involves the terms placebo and nocebo. And, on the basis that such a discussion would never exist in the absence of the term nocebo, I believe that the discussion is better located in the nocebo article.
(2) I went through all the information that I could find on the matter; and, on the basis of what I found, I coded it as follows:
- ==Ambiguity of medical usage==
And, when this was clicked on, you were immediately taken to the appropriate part of the Nocebo article.
(The same thing also applies to the next piece, referring readers to another section on the ambiguity of anthropological usage -- which, for similar reasons, I also believe must remain under nocebo).
(3) The article Placebo (origins of technical term) contains a sub-section "Diverse applications of the term Placebo".
(4) The text that was taken from the entire article Placebo (origins of technical term) and expanded into what is now Uses of the term placebo was actually taken from the sub-section "Diverse applications of the term Placebo".
(5) I want to make a similar redirection to readers -- appearing at the head of the Uses of the term placebo -- and allow them to go directly to the "Diverse applications of the term Placebo" sub-section of the Placebo (origins of technical term) article.
(6) I have entered what I believe is the correct coding (based on the fact that it seems to match the other successful coding 100%) as follows:
(7) It doesn't work. I simply sends the reader to the head of the page, rather than to the appropriate sub-section.
(8) Have I coded it wrongly -- and, therefore, was my earlier success just "by chance"? -- or is it that the presence of the bracket/parenthesis ")" at the end of the title and before the hash "#" somehow complicated things?
I hope that you can guide me once moreLindsay658 06:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for removing the piece without telling you that I had solved the problem. Thanks again Lindsay658 04:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
^5
Looks like everything is going well [4]. Thank you and I think you will do fine. Thanks for the kind words which came at a time when they were needed.:)--Dakota ~ 00:27, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I will shortly. I am taking care of a fussy four year old right now.--Dakota ~ 01:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)