User talk:Kuflase

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kuflase (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can someone explain why my account was blocked? Kuflase (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If there is currently a need for additional explanation, Djsasso, the blocking administrator, may be able to provide such explanation. An unblock request is not needed to ask for clarification: Unblock requests can be used to request an unblock if the block reason is incorrect or obsolete. The following information may help:

The block reason is "Abusing multiple accounts: Max Arosev"
Max Arosev (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is prohibited from editing Wikipedia, yet has attempted to circumvent this restriction many times. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Max Arosev/Archive.
The very first thing you did on Wikipedia was joining an edit war, which is not a wise thing to do in general, and suspicious in this particular case.

The following template is commonly used to explain the problem, so I'll add it here:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The following template is additionally relevant, since nobody will unblock you if you don't address the following issue as well:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kuflase (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, the "edit warring" incident was peacefully resolved, and I don't see that as something that should be punished by blocking an editor indefinitely. Besides that, I made some really well-sourced and useful edits and was even thanked for one of them. With regard to this "abusing multiple accounts" accusation, Kuflase is my only account. If you think that by just trying to balance some articles, I made myself look suspicious and resembled some blocked accounts, that it is just your assumption. Again, please unblock me because I did not violate any policies. My edits are sourced and neutral. Thanks. Kuflase (talk) 01:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's understandable, however edit warring is only a part of the problem.. You're right, edit warring does not usually result in an indefinite block. The real problem is the sock puppetry. Please read that part of the WP:GAB.-- Deep fried okra 01:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.