User talk:KubaMark

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, KubaMark. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 11:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warwick (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Written very promotionally as if to sell the company to the readers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seco/Warwick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seco/Warwick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 15:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KubaMark! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS ^message 15:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your note. I can't understand why this article sounds like an advertisement. There is a lot of similar pages like Toyota, Brembo, Iphone and many many others and they are published on wikipedia. I've read articles about neutral point of view, sources and others, but still don't know how i can improve article about Seco/Warwick. I think that it's worth to add article about them to wikipedia. They are innovative (cooperating with univerities to develope their technology) and they operate worldwide. Can you give me a simple explanation what i have to do to publish this article? Best Regards KubaMark (talk) 10:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nitriding. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. I urge you to review the links provided by Deb above. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Seco/Warwick

Greetings. I suggest you post questions to the AfC Helpdesk, with many editors who have over 10 years of experience editing on Wikipedia. The "History" section could be written in paragraph form instead of a list for starters. Same goes for Activity section. Try not to include the capital amount and percentage. It will look as if extracted from a brochure. Generally, awards for a company are written on some wikipedia pages but ISO certification should absolutely not be written. Cheers. EROS ^message 04:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]