User talk:Ktulu789
Warnings
[edit]February 2006
[edit]Thank you for experimenting with the page Keyboard layout on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.↔NMajdan•talk 21:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Response to email
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! Your userpage looks fine. If you have any questions about editing on Wikipedia, feel free to ask me on my talk page or you can ask over at the help desk as well.↔NMajdan•talk 14:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "O’Connor"
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A page you created, O’Connor, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Eruca Sativa"
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A page you created, Eruca Sativa, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.
I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.
If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.
The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.
We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
O'Connor
[edit]You have some assertions on the talk page that keep me from immediately speedying the article, but this article is nowhere near ready. Can you provide credible third-party reliable sources that verify that the band has had major label releases, significant radio rotation, etc.? Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:28, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Seraphimblade I added links to some newpapers and even major radio networks. These sources are realiable and independent to the band. I hope that now the article looks complete. I'm completely new here but in the last few days I learned many interesting things about Wikipedia and how it works and it is amazing. I hope I got the point now.
- Just in case you didn't watchlist this talk I'll leave you a notice :-D Ktulu789 talk with me 04:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC) Ktulu789
Open question Sandbox vs Preview
[edit]![]() |
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page. |
I often use the preview button to test if a format I want to set works or not... Usually it takes some previews before the text looks fine. Is it right to do so? And if so, then what is the sandbox for? I have read the help about Sandbox but I don't get the difference between it and the preview.
Open question for any kind user to reply :-D Wiki markup is great! It's easier than HTML! Ktulu789 Talk with me 05:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. It's good to preview your edits to make sure your edit is as you intended, though it's not required. Your own sandbox is just a page you can use to work on and test / experiment with various things—whether it's a draft of a new article you are working on or a complex template that doesn't work when you preview your changes. Hope that helps. wctaiwan (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- You can use the preview button as many times as you'd like. Some people prefer using this; others prefer to save the page in a sandbox. You can use whichever you prefer. However, you should keep in mind that if you preview a page, your changes are not saved anywhere. If you were to accidentally close the browser window, your work would be lost.
- Some people also like to use sandboxes for longterm projects. For example, I've drafted entire articles in the sandbox, a process that sometimes takes me many days. This is better-suited to sandbox editing than previewing, as my work would not be saved anywhere in a preview, and session data might be lost. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Both answers are right, Thanks. I will keep both! This surely helped me. I'm amazed at the speed that the help me thing worked! Wow! Thanks again for your kind response! I thought the sandbox get's automatically cleaned sometimes... I will check that on the help again! Ktulu789 Talk with me 16:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- The public sandbox at Wikipedia:Sandbox is constantly being purged—you should not use that one for anything other than test edits you don't need to keep. However, the one you get by clicking on "My Sandbox" (near the top right hand corner) and the ones you create yourself (e.g. you can go ahead and create User:Ktulu789/sandbox_2 if you need two places to work on different things) would not be cleared unless you do so yourself. wctaiwan (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, now I understand. Thanks a bunch WCTaiwan! You are a great helper!! 非常感谢,再见!(I learnt some mandarin. I love it! I hope you undestand it :-D Are you from Taiwan? Great, then you don't have a Great Firewall in between!)Ktulu789 Talk with me 03:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- The public sandbox at Wikipedia:Sandbox is constantly being purged—you should not use that one for anything other than test edits you don't need to keep. However, the one you get by clicking on "My Sandbox" (near the top right hand corner) and the ones you create yourself (e.g. you can go ahead and create User:Ktulu789/sandbox_2 if you need two places to work on different things) would not be cleared unless you do so yourself. wctaiwan (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Both answers are right, Thanks. I will keep both! This surely helped me. I'm amazed at the speed that the help me thing worked! Wow! Thanks again for your kind response! I thought the sandbox get's automatically cleaned sometimes... I will check that on the help again! Ktulu789 Talk with me 16:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Some people also like to use sandboxes for longterm projects. For example, I've drafted entire articles in the sandbox, a process that sometimes takes me many days. This is better-suited to sandbox editing than previewing, as my work would not be saved anywhere in a preview, and session data might be lost. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Glad I could help. :) wctaiwan (talk) 11:22, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
En cuanto al señor O'Connor...
[edit]Hola Lucas, vi que has traído a la wiki en inglés a O'Connor (band), te felicito, el artículo está muy bien y me diste el puntapié inicial para hacer lo mismo con otros que hacen falta acá. Te cuento que yo he tratado de traducir los artículos Claudio O'Connor y Malón (band). Aunque no se si están bien traducidos y bien contextualizados, ya que solamente sé inglés básico. ¿Te gustaría revisarlos, corregirlos, agregar o quitar info? Si lo deseas, no problem. Saludos y aguante la buena música. Sebastian --S3b4s5 (talk) 08:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)