User talk:Kswikiaccount

Kswikiaccount, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kswikiaccount! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Kswikiaccount, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, though I reverted your edit to User talk:Guy1890 per WP:OWNTALK. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 17:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies, if you have time, I'm kind of curious why you reverted the edit. The editor Guy1890 is going against wikipedia policies by being uncivil and unwelcoming, so I added links to wikipedia pages so he could learn how to be less uncivil. Thanks for leaving this information.Kswikiaccount (talk) 18:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

Just so you know there is a one revert rule on Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 in place, please self revert. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one that broke the 1RR when you reverted my revert of your edit on June 8. Kswikiaccount (talk) 20:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had no way of knowing that was you, 1RR says "by an editor" log in next time. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about. Tone down your behavior, I'm insulted by this "log in next time". I was logged in, and seeing as to how you're the one that made the mistake, go on the Democratic Primary talk page and tell everyone you made a mistake. Or is it everyone else that is at fault except you, the god? Kswikiaccount (talk) 21:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Katie^talk 02:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Ali

You should check out Brother Ali. He is white (because of a congenital disorder called albinism). [1] [2] [3] [4] The Quixotic Potato (talk) 14:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard of him before. He's pretty cool. Thanks for posting this. Lol. BTW how did you figure out I like Brother Ali? Kswikiaccount (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I wasn't 100% sure, but I read your post on the RefDesk and I figured you would probably like Brother Ali too. I often trust my gut-feelings. My gut speaks truthiness! I have been listening to hiphop for over 25 years now. If you have any recommendations of artists I should listen to then please let me know; I am always looking for ways to expand my collection. I dislike most of the "bitches & bling"-stuff but there are many other styles I do enjoy, from hardcore hiphop and horrorcore, political hip hop and conscious hip hop to chaphop and nerdcore. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 18:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@The Quixotic Potato:Sure, I love the coup. They tend to take a more serious stance on racism then a lot of other artists.Kswikiaccount (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My userpage (NSFW, 18+) contains a link to The Coup - I Ain't The Nigga! I think I have every album made by The Coup and dead prez. Mo Asumang made a very interesting documentary; highly recommended! Here is a list of a small part of my music collection. I have a lot more, but this list should give an indication of the stuff I've been listening to. I hope you know some good artists that are not on the list. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, okay.

You cannot claim I broke 1RR for undoing my own edit. S51438 (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so 2 Reverts in 24 hours is not a violation of the 1RR? Kswikiaccount (talk) 21:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Edit_warring#3RR_exemptions and the section below that one. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've read that section before I told him he violated 1RR on that page. He was not changing vandalism or copyright or any other exemption. Kswikiaccount (talk) 22:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, I didn't actually check the edits because I am too lazy; I just pointed out that reverting yourself is exempt from 3RR and 1RR. The Quixotic Potato (talk) 23:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say that reverting one's own edits are exempt from 1RR? I see that for 3RR. [*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Revert_only_when_necessary#One-revert_rule] Michael Sheflin (talk) 00:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Msheflin: The page you linked to is an essay. The page I linked to is policy. The difference is explained over here. The page I linked to at 21:37 says that reverting ones own edits is exempt from 3RR. It also explains what the difference is between 3RR and 1RR. Please read Wikipedia:Edit_warring#3RR_exemptions and the section below that one.
Quote: The one-revert rule is analogous to the three-revert rule as described above, with the words "more than three reverts" replaced by "more than one revert". The Quixotic Potato (talk) 02:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Michael Sheflin (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]