User talk:Ksu6500
{{NoACEMM}}
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
|
Talkback
[edit]August 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Linda Cardellini, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Dates for index changes
[edit]Hey KSU, saw you reverted my change. I match the press release source; to roll forward to the first day of trading is original research in those situations when the announcement says the change is effective after a certain day's close of trading. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- @UnitedStatesian:Hey UnitedStatesian, I have always done my edits as the Date First Added in the recent changes section. So in this case the changes were after the close of trading on Friday, December 20. Then the first day of trading as a part of the index would be on Monday, December 23. That matches each component entry above for Facebook, Alliance Data and Mohawk. IMO the dates should match.Ksu6500 (talk) 01:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
[edit]The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For tireless edits to stock index articles, and elsewhere, thanks! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Help with Sculptor Capital Management edits
[edit]Nice to meet you, Ksu6500. I'm Michael. I have an edit request at Talk:Sculptor Capital Management. I noticed you actively edit pages related to business, stocks, and investment. I would appreciate your review of my request and the implementation of these updates if you agree. Thanks! Michael at Sculptor Capital (talk) 15:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Considerations in Reverting
[edit]Hello Ksu6500. I usually try to understand an edit before reverting it. If I think an edit is defective, I usually try to see what can be preserved and do so rather than revert. Otherwise, I prefer to discuss an edit with an editor specially when the edit is a curious one or seems to be a mistake. I think knee jerk reversions are presumptive, dogmatic, and discourteous. But this is just me. My edit 1125259234 to James Woodson’s Spouses in the infobox was an attempt to correct spacing in the Mobile view not realizing the wikiprogram would screw it up in the Desktop view. Unlike you, I’ve worked around the original edit so spacing is correct in both views. Regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 05:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)