User talk:Kskim33
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kskim33, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Feedback on draft
[edit]Hi, Kskim33. I took a look at your draft article and I've got a few comments:
- You might want to add a few more sources to your article to get a more comprehensive look at the topic. This review of Linebaugh and Rediker looks promising for a few reasons: 1. it attempts to frame their look at the subject (or explain how they frame it); 2. it reaches into the sources they use to make their claims and can give some color on that, should you need it; 3. it references other elements of the literature, always useful for a starting point. I don't want to send you back to the drawing board because I think you've got a solid start here, but a few more references help the article get off to a broader, more neutral start.
- Direct quotations require page numbers. This can be a bit onerous with named references (re-use of the same reference multiple times) because each reference points to the book only. You can get around this by adding {{rp}} after your reference with a specific page number so e.g.
{{rp|22}}. Let me know if you need a hand with this.- In the VisualEditor, you can add templates by selecting "Template" and typing in "rp". The next screen should allow you to enter in a page number and that's all you need to do. I've added a fake page number for your first quote so you can see what it looks like.
I hope this helps. Let me know if you need a hand with any of the above. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hey, I really dig that you are tackling this topic. I think if you take head Adams advice you are going to have one of the more interesting additions to wikipedia. Just broaden this a bit, use more sources, incorporate more voices in order to flesh this out as a large topic area and not some one's thesis. Very cool stuff.Cjmallos (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]This is a nice review of such a complicated topic. I think something that could help make it better is perhaps rewording the beginning when you talk about the root of the word. It is a bit confusing. Putting something like "The term stems from (insert the roots here)" might make it easier to read. Alexhuseman (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)