User talk:Kseruntine/sandbox

Article Evaluation

As far as everything in the article being relevant, I could not tell what was article and what was just comments from other people. The information from peoples comments and stuff seemed to be a little out of date. A lot of dates I saw were from 2007-2009. What could be improved is clarifying what is the actual article. From what I could tell, most of the article was neutral. "Animal Intelligence" seemed to have a lot of people commenting and editing. "Spatial Cognition" also had a lot of information. I checked the link for "Chimp has an ear for talk" and it seemed like a reliable source. The facts seemed checked and like they came from reliable sources. The articles are part of Wikiprojects. The kinds of conversations going on are giving facts and comments about the topics. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Animal_cognition#New_Information>

Article Selection

1. Mental illness portrayed in media- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_illness_portrayed_in_media

   - The section we could add would be "Mental Health Portrayed in social media"
   -I also think we would be able to add to the section- News. 
   - Mental Health is a really hot topic right now and movies and TV don't always accurately display it. This can growth when we learn about Social Networks in Society.

Potential Sources

1. Link: https://link-springer-com.libezp.lib.lsu.edu/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00127-018-1571-5.pdf This source goes in depth about the stigmatization of mental health through social media platforms. It gives examples of things such as OCD, anxiety, or depression are used to describe things so trivial that it makes people who suffer from the real thing less likely to be taken seriously.

Citation: Robinson, Patrick, et al. “Measuring Attitudes towards Mental Health Using Social Media: Investigating Stigma and Trivialisation.” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Aug. 2018. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1007/s00127-018-1571-5.

2.Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media

This source talks about how social media can affect sleep patterns, changes in mood, other negative effects on mental illness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kseruntine (talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topics Not Chosen By Professor

2. Online Social Support-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_social_support

    -  The new section we could create would be called "Social Support and Social Media"
    -  In this course we talk about research and the media. If people suffering in mental health did not have access to social media or the internet at all they wouldn't be able to search symptoms or how to get help.

3. Mental health informatics--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_health_informatics

    - The new section we could create could be "Benefits of Mental Health Informatics."
    - In this class we learn about technology and mental health informatics is a form of technology.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kseruntine (talk • contribs) 15:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Peer Review:

Overall, our peer review was positive. Our information was relevant, our data is strong. The only thing that was presented as an issue was our use of the Wiki voice. To fix this, altering the viewpoint and making it less negative towards the representation of Mental Illness in Social Media and steering it more in the direction of being informative from a neutral standpoint on the subject. Reqording the information taken in the article presented in the introduction will help to steer it in the right direction. The feedback was helpful and informative. Ecalam1 (talk) 02:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)ecalam1[reply]