This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Matxin, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://matxin.sourceforge.net. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Matxin and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Matxin with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.orgor a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Matxin.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I defined that article in Wikipedia in order to give information on this system of machine translation that was developed in a research project directed by myself (http://ixa.si.ehu.es/Ixa/Produktuak/1273221240, http://ixa.si.ehu.es/Ixa/Produktuak/Patenteak/1020345725/1232534347 ). As the text we defined in http://matxin.sourceforge.net was a nice description in the project, I selected and adapted some pieces of that definition to create a new entry in Wikipedia. As I see, it was deleted. Sorry, I spend some time to do it, but now I think it was wasted time.
Please, could anybody send me the text of the entry that was deleted? If I had time I could try to do it better next time.
Ksarasola
16:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Basque Summer University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Valenciano (talk) 10:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is quite frustrating. I spent more than one hour this morning to define this new entry, and just this afternoon it is completely missing.
I have nothing for redoing it. I defined that article in Wikipedia in order to give information on this organism (http://www.ueu.org/who-are-we) of which I am an active member. As the text we defined in http://www.ueu.org/who-are-we was a nice start point to describe this organism, I selected, adapted and extended some pieces of that definition to create a new entry in Wikipedia. I did not hide this URL, I added it as a external link. But now the whole definition has been deleted. It is really frustrating. Sorry, I spend some time to do it, but now I think it was wasted time. .
I thought it was quite clear that I am a member of this organization, as it is described in my user description. But now I realized that my user description in Basque (http://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lankide:Ksarasola) is not readable from the English Wikipedia, Sorry it is my fault.
In Basque: * UEUko Informatika Saila
In English: Computer Science section in the Basque Summer University.
Please, could anybody send me the text of the entry i defined this morning and that was deleted? If I had time I could try to do it better next time.
Ksarasola
Ksarasola (talk) 17:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The siege of San Sebastian (1813) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‑ Iridescent11:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Iñaki Goirizelaia) has been reviewed!
@Ksarasola: thanks for the quick response - I've removed the refimprove. A couple of remaining issues to consider:
"Faculty of Engineering in Bilb[a]o" is ambiguous. Was this at one of the University of the Basque Country's faculties? (for instance could be at Mondragon University
The second paragraph about the new law doesn't detail the result. If there the new law was gotten up, then that's important and needs to be covered. If the proposal went nowhere, then that might belong at the University's article, but is less obvious as needing to be covered at his page.
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Joan Mari Torrealdai you included material translated from the Basque Wikipedia. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 14:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Joan Mari Torrealdai) has been reviewed!
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Ksarasola: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 16:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Kaixo Ksarasola! Zer moduz? I have slightly copyedited Joan Mari Torrealdai for English, still I can hardly understand what "in this study" means, what does it refer to? ("Firstly, in this study the book production is understood as an indicative of our society."). Ondo segi Iñaki LL (talk) 22:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to Euskaltzaindia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!19:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony D. Pájaro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tokio. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Evelyn Boyd Granville may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Your addition to Euskaltzaindia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Plaiaundi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 00:28, 19 February 2022 (UTC)