User talk:Krystal Mac

May 2022

Hello, I'm Kadermonkey. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kamina Johnson-Smith seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kadermonkey the monkey (talk) 20:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Kadermonkey, I noted your point. However, I think the removal was a mistake. The information added was in fact neutral as it was drawn from official government sources and the minister's webpage. We would appreciate if the information could be re-uploaded. Krystal Mac (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kamina Johnson Smith

Welcome to Wikipedia. Every text added to an article needs to be fully referenced by independent sources. Please see WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:REF. This is a biography of a living person, so it's even more important that all is verified. Citations from her own webiste does not count as neutral or a reliable source. WP is an encyclopedia. Best wishes. Anna (talk) 10:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for continued edits. I have cleaned the article up a bit, adding links and tags, to make it sound less like a PR puff piece. It still needs further reliable refs, esp as the biography of a living person, which is taken seriously. There are some WP standard editing protocols, such as only using the subject's surname (not including honorifics in the body of the article). Please try and link acronyms, such as WTO, so readers have a clue which organisation is signified. Please don't use jargon or CV style. This is an encyclopedia and we try and stick with this formal, neutral tone. Some element of criticism or controversy (referenced) would help the article to feel less like a hagiography. I presume in her career there have been low points. We are not here to celebrate her - just to describe what has happened. NB: If others introduce these elements, with strong, citations, then they will be kept. For the record, nobody close to an article's subject is allowed to edit the piece. Please check WP:COI. The article is getting stronger. Please do add further refs for the outstanding tags. If you are unclear on the reasons for my editing changes, or if I have made errors, let me know. Best wishes. Anna (talk) 00:37, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for continuing to add citations. This is one massive paragraph. Probably best to split it up. Best wishes. Anna (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Krystal Mac! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Editing the article name or changing the article name, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]